<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Of daemons, evolution and intolerance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2005/02/09/of_daemons_evolution_and_intolerance/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2005/02/09/of_daemons_evolution_and_intolerance</link>
	<description>Politics, tech and media issues from a Muslim perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yusuf Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2005/02/09/of_daemons_evolution_and_intolerance#comment-4717</link>
		<dc:creator>Yusuf Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 21:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogistan.co.uk/ijwp/mt.php/2005/02/09/of_daemons_evolution_and_intolerance#comment-4717</guid>
		<description>You may be right - there is an acronym explanation for daemon (disk and executive monitor), but it is a &quot;backronym&quot; (see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.takeourword.com/TOW146/page4.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;).

I personally suspect that the explanation you offer is a retrospective one also - let&#039;s face it, demon and devil terminology is often applied to useful things (as in the cutlery brand Kitchen Devils).  I suspect that they were called that because they hang in the background and are invisible to the common user.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may be right - there is an acronym explanation for daemon (disk and executive monitor), but it is a &#8220;backronym&#8221; (see <a href="http://www.takeourword.com/TOW146/page4.html">here</a>).</p>

<p>I personally suspect that the explanation you offer is a retrospective one also - let&#8217;s face it, demon and devil terminology is often applied to useful things (as in the cutlery brand Kitchen Devils).  I suspect that they were called that because they hang in the background and are invisible to the common user.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell</title>
		<link>http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2005/02/09/of_daemons_evolution_and_intolerance#comment-4716</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 19:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogistan.co.uk/ijwp/mt.php/2005/02/09/of_daemons_evolution_and_intolerance#comment-4716</guid>
		<description>&quot;Daemon is in fact an acronym, and refers to the processes known in Windows as services...&quot;

From the Unix System Administration Handbook, coming to me by way of the FreeBSD website:

&quot;&#039;Daemon&#039; is actually a much older form of &#039;demon&#039;; daemons have no
particular bias towards good or evil, but rather serve to help define a
person&#039;s character or personality.&quot;

My understanding is that this older form (complete with archaic spelling) is a whimsical-yet-convenient term used to describe programs designed to run as background processes on a UNIX system, because it implies that these processes are the &quot;animating spirits&quot; of the system.

This is the first I&#039;ve heard of &quot;DAEMON&quot; being an acronym.  What does it stand for?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Daemon is in fact an acronym, and refers to the processes known in Windows as services&#8230;&#8221;</p>

<p>From the Unix System Administration Handbook, coming to me by way of the FreeBSD website:</p>

<p>&#8220;&#8216;Daemon&#8217; is actually a much older form of &#8216;demon&#8217;; daemons have no
particular bias towards good or evil, but rather serve to help define a
person&#8217;s character or personality.&#8221;</p>

<p>My understanding is that this older form (complete with archaic spelling) is a whimsical-yet-convenient term used to describe programs designed to run as background processes on a UNIX system, because it implies that these processes are the &#8220;animating spirits&#8221; of the system.</p>

<p>This is the first I&#8217;ve heard of &#8220;DAEMON&#8221; being an acronym.  What does it stand for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Konrad</title>
		<link>http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2005/02/09/of_daemons_evolution_and_intolerance#comment-4715</link>
		<dc:creator>Konrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2005 12:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogistan.co.uk/ijwp/mt.php/2005/02/09/of_daemons_evolution_and_intolerance#comment-4715</guid>
		<description>You are an absolute idiot. Salaam alaykum.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are an absolute idiot. Salaam alaykum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

