Shiv Malik's threats
I had a number of pieces to write here yesterday, but was unable to get down to write any of them because I received a threatening email from Shiv Malik, about whose "Hizbis have jobs" nonsense I wrote an entry on Monday. On Tuesday, he sent me an email asking for my phone number, inviting me to hear his side of the story because "if you've ever worked in the media then you shouldn't be aghast at the fact that i might not get everything that I want to say across to the readers". I didn't reply immediately, intending to ponder my response. Yesterday, his tone had changed, and he sent me this:
Hi if you don't respond pretty sharpish to my email giving some contact details a part from your email address I might consider suing. Of course it is highly libellous to call some one a liar because it is disparaging in their work, profession. Regards Shiv.
Well, as I said, I didn't reply "sharpish" because I didn't have time; I spent Tuesday either working or in London, and didn't get home until about 9pm. I actually have a day job; I do not make my living from blogging. However, Shiv has had all that time to use my comments facility as a right to reply; he has chosen not to do so, and resorted to threatening emails.
I note that he uses the word liar. I would like to know where he got the idea that I called him a liar, because I did not do so on the blog. I called him dishonest, which is, in my judgement, what his article on Sunday was. It contained a number of irrelevances and "scare facts" in a story whose central fact was simply that HT members have highly-paid professional jobs, as one might expect as they are mostly highly educated people. This is part of his paper's campaign against the least-threatening of all the Islamist groups operating.
The story also contained one demonstrable falsehood, which is what a lie is. He quoted a paragraph from a short article on a HT website, in which he substituted the word kaffir for kaafir. All the instances of the article one can gather from a simple Google search contain the spelling "kaafir", which means unbeliever. In his article, he substitutes "kaffir", which is an Afrikaans derogatory term for black people. The terms have decidedly different connotations, despite being only one letter different and the Afrikaans being derived from the Arabic (via Malay). Many pairs of words, with wholly different meanings, have only one different letter.
If this is a misprint or a spell-checker error, I'm happy to accept this and apologise, but he should also have a pretty good explanation for why he has not said so in two emails. He might also explain why he wrote, in the 7th August Independent on Sunday, that Zeyno Baran of the Nixon Center had "warned" him of HT's indoctrination tactics, when in fact she wrote her "warning" in the National Review. Do people repeat things they wrote in a magazine verbatim in conversation? It's possible, but it's unlikely. The way it was written gives the impression of a warning from Zeyno Baran to Shiv Malik, but a brief investigation reveals that the quote is from a magazine article which you can find with a quick Google search. Now, Shiv, answer the question: have you ever met, or contacted, Zeyno Baran?
Shiv Malik still has the option of using my comment space for his right to reply. I do not censor it, other than for certain things like spam, permatrolls, and certain other things to which I object. If someone disagrees with the content of my blog, let them say so here, rather than send me threatening emails.
Comments
Dont let the ***** get you down Br Yusuf.
Posted by: Haroon | September 15, 2005 8:09 AM
hmm.. I think it's a bit harsh of you to have posted his email on this blog. Cos he has chosen to write it to you and not to the blog. Have some mercy on the poor guy!
Like many others obviously, he doesnt think that there are people out there who can see beyond the propaganda and scare mongering, or sometimes outright lies. Hence, when they encounter critical responses, they are unable to cope... that's why he is not writing to your blog. Reminds me of George Galloways statement at the US senate, they all went silent after having raised all the so-called "serious" allegations against him.
In as much as I appreciate knowing that he contacted you to protest, next time you may want to spare us the full details of his correspondence .... If he wants it to be public, I think he will come to say something here.
In anycase, I think you have rightly and accurately classified their views under windbags. If they are not windbags, they will learn to write responsibly and present facts as they are - as opposed to distorting things for whatever reasons.
It's one thing to disagree with Islam and muslim cultures (which is not a problem, not everybody will eat the same food), it's another thing to distort it wrecklessly and yet stand on an illusory high-ground passing subtle moral verdicts. That is very typical of people who the Prophet (peace be upon him) described as "windbags". People whose intention is only to create effect for some ulterior/incoherent motive. He spoke the truth, salallahu 'aleihi wa salam.
Sorry to dwell on this guys. I have only been reading the media closely and am struck by the "oddity", to be charitable.
Just say to Yusuf, becareful with your blog. I am anony mouse! hehe! Well, except for my IP address.
Posted by: anonymous | September 15, 2005 9:09 AM
Suing?! Does he think he have some sort of diplomatic immunity ? If pointing out the dishonestly of third rate hack like Malik is grounds for litigation, then HT and British royalty have one hell of a lawsuit on their hands. Dont let the goon intimidate you, Yusuf. He cant do a damn thing.
Posted by: DrM | September 15, 2005 10:09 AM
if he attempts to sue you do not worry - i have a legal team ready to make him bankrupt even if he attempts such things. Do not worry your blog's do not suggest anything that would give him grounds to sue. In fact his email is more suggestive of a threat itself, which under british law he is lia ble to being prosecuted. Do not worry
Posted by: jason | September 15, 2005 12:09 PM
Thanks for exposing Shiv's mediocre, substandard jounrnalism. What a sorry excuse for a Journalist he is!
Posted by: Imran | September 15, 2005 12:09 PM
I met this guy when I went to the recording ofZaiuddin Sardars programme that was aired last night. I also found his conclusions about HT quite condemming, however his article in the Independant is totally sensationalised.He seemed to groom himself on Ziauddin Sardar (not really a honour is it), as well as having some strange, almost bordering on nasty comments on Tariq Ramadan. He has to make his mark, so I can only assume he has to come up with something outrageous to get a regular slot.
Posted by: farah | September 15, 2005 12:09 PM
Hi I will be happy to respond on your blog. It's just that it's hard to trust a man who calls you a liar. Anyway I suppose I don't have a problem with it now!
I would like to point out, you have called me a liar. I point to your heading "Shiv Malik Lies Again". Call me stupid or what but the process of deduction is kind of well⦠homosimplisticus.
So I'd like to gladly inform you with open arms, a bunch of flowers and a balloon (thatâÂÂs about as non- threatening as I can get these days) that I am not able to call anyone a liar in the big boy world of journalism (ooh those harsh insults) because I would get sued. Unless of course I had solid proof. IâÂÂm sure being a fairly reasonable person- judging by your blog- that you understand this.
So yes I spelt Kaafir wrongly. I apologise for that and thank you for pointing it out. However I don't think it is a hanging offence or even dishonest. Just slightly illetarate*. I blame that on being lazy in year five. However since there is no official transliteration from the Arabic its not entirely unfair to spell it like that. I also think that it is fair to argue that Kaafir like kaffir is employed pejoratively by the Hizbub and others.
Let me put add this, could you imagine what the response from the Muslim communities would be if say Rowan Williams publicly stated that we should boycott or refuse to integrate with the âÂÂunbelieversâÂÂ. IâÂÂll leave that to you.
So did I lie? Well the word lie incorporates the term intention. How do you know that it was my intention to ill inform my readership and if so for what real gain? You assume all of this with total confidence. Should you?
You also assume that because I use quotes by Zeyno Baran, that have also appeared in her articles, I must not have spoken to her. I have, on many occasions and she is a lovely and fascinatingly intelligent person. I have the email correspondence to prove it but IâÂÂd hate to give it to you as IâÂÂm sure that youâÂÂd publish it and that really wouldnâÂÂt be fair to Zeyno. But contact her if you wish.
So back to the point. Is it that crazy that she could have repeated to me verbally what she wrote in her report? No, you even suggest it yourself. That in fact must have been the case but I never noticed that what was in her report was also reproduced in her speech. I tend to have better things to do than to pick holes over the minutia of life (there are those insults again, they just slip out sorry).
So again you assume the worst about my character. No problem. IâÂÂm fairly tough and can take a lot of invective, itâÂÂs part of my job I suppose. However I did expect a better more rational response from you, Yusuf. Obviously I was wrong and frankly IâÂÂm heart broken and wallowing in the pain of life at the betrayal of rationality.
Anyway I would love to defend myself and debate the real issues here especially when I am being called a liar. But lets do it openly and in public- we could even charge the audience and give the money to the registered charity of your choice!
I have made my views public before. I have faced questioning from Inayat Bunglawala himself on his own show on the Islam channel. I have nothing to hide except my convictions (no doubt evily twisting an Oscar Wilde quote there. I hope you dont mind).
So if you give me your details then I will phone you and we can meet in a public forum along with as many people whoâÂÂd like to attend. Yes even Imran Waheed can join in if he wants. I would of course, love to give you my address but IâÂÂve already had enough hate mail as it is. Why I got slightly arsy is if your willing to make allegations then you should respond to those that you have never met, spoken to or communicated with ever, pretty promptly. Isn't anything else just a little rude? But I do it myself all the time so i guess i don't do unto others what I'd have done unto me.
Regards, wishes and kisses,
Your mate, Shiv.
*thatâÂÂs a joke spelling by the way- donâÂÂt take it seriously
P.S. Jason with your legal knowledge, the invitations to the Bar must be flooding in.
Posted by: SHIV MALIK | September 15, 2005 3:09 PM
Hi Shiv,
Your thesis was that hizbi guys are infiltrating British institutions, i.e they are not necessarily people working in professional jobs like many people in this country (UK).
How would you go about defending such a thesis?
Do you have any secret recordings of them talking about infiltrating British companies and institutions? Do you have any proof, or any indication that this might be the case?
This is what you should present.
All these sensationalist journalism is really irresponsible.
Myself, I do not like hizbutahrir one bit, I disagree with them, but that shouldn't lead us to portray them as some masonic order.
If you think you have something to say to them, you should debate them on the ideology they profess ...rather than writing nonsense about them infiltrating companies or shops.
Posted by: anonymous | September 15, 2005 4:09 PM
In the last decade we have had a string of brownsahibs on telly and in the popular press feeding the masses with bloodcurdling stories about radicalised asians conspiring in mosque basements, universities, community centres. We need to thank Shiv Malik for exposing this new danger in the midst of City boardrooms.
For example HT members working for Severn Trent could put stuff in our drinking water to make our hair go green, infiltrate air traffic control and make planes collide or put laxatives in our supplies of Cadbury's chocolate. They could even stage takeovers of great British brand names such as Heinz baked beans and rename the products to something silly such as "Khilafah Beans". The implications are too profound for us to ignore.
Posted by: Haroon | September 15, 2005 5:09 PM
Haroon,
Ah Ha Ha Ha Ha!
Posted by: bikhair | September 15, 2005 7:09 PM
Bro. Yusuf,
Asalaamualaikum wa rahmatullah... I have to have a word with you about some of my posts that I feel have been unfairly deleted.
Posted by: bikhair | September 15, 2005 7:09 PM
Farah,
I saw the Ziauddin Sardar programme on BBC 4. Tariq Ramadan was simply brilliant, head-and-shoulders above everyone else and made Zia look like a schoolboy. The Syrian lady from the Royal Institute of Something was quite good too.
Sometimes when reading Zia's articles I have to remind myself that he is Muslim.
Posted by: binti simba | September 16, 2005 9:09 AM
Its no laughing matter Bikhair. Birds Eye recently exposed a HT activist working in their marketing department. Apparently there was a sinister plot to replace the Captain in fish fingers adverts with Omar Bakri or Abu Hamza. Using hypnosis/subliminal messaging thousands of British muslims could have been unwittingly indoctrinated with their perverted brand of Islam....
Posted by: Haroon | September 16, 2005 10:09 AM
Our khatib today at jumuah was an HT brother. Mashallah he spoke quite well and wisely. I take it back that I do not agree with HT "one bit". Besides doctrinal issues, it is quite difficult to put your finger on their problem. May be it an attitude or approach issue. Sometimes they sound so reasonable, but other times they sound funny. Isn't that the way we all are...?
Posted by: anonymous | September 16, 2005 5:09 PM
>Let me put add this, could you imagine what the response from the >Muslim communities would be if say Rowan Williams publicly stated that >we should boycott or refuse to integrate with the âÂÂunbelieversâÂÂ.
Shivvy-boy, with such moronic rhetoric people should be questioning your intelligence, not just the veracity of your âÂÂjournalismâÂÂ. You are nothing more than a shrill rent-a-quote. For the record, my response would be as benign as when Pope Benedict XVI opposed Turkish accession to the EU; "another continent, in permanent contrast with Europe" were his exact words. A hugely anti-integrationist message from a figure that is far more influential than HT can ever dream to be. I have an equally calm response to many of the PopeâÂÂs other strident comments about Islam and modern secularism. Most of us understand that he has every right to hold such views and express them publicly, which is why we wonâÂÂt pushing people towards some kind of witch hunt. But donâÂÂt let such objectivity hold you back, you just carry on being a good boy and say what Bwana in the big house wants to hear.
Posted by: Atticus | September 17, 2005 4:09 PM
How arrogant of Shiv Malik. You can come here and lie further to try to cover things up but Shiv, with your journalism has exposed your Uncle Tom credentials.
Do you think we were born yesterday, Mr Sellout?
Posted by: Muslim | September 18, 2005 3:09 PM
Brother I would like to ask you some genuine questions regarding my interest/confusion around some tariqahs.
Please email me on the address above. (I cant find your elusive email address)
wsalam
Posted by: afaredi | September 28, 2005 3:46 PM
Hi Shiv, your abhorrence to some of the key ideas of Islam that are the core of Hizb Ut Tahrir shows precisely that you don’t represent Muslims and yet you use your Muslim name (or Muslim by name) credentials to get your fictional babble on to the papers. You were and are still, handpicked to be the traitor to the Muslims by going against a lot of the Islamic ideas that Muslims carry. Your sentiments aren’t Islamic and neither are your concepts, what is left of you other than a arrogant individual who only stands out because he's taking the populist, sensationalist, ignorant fears of the west and using them to back-stab and badmouth a large number of Muslims in the UK. Unlike you, most Muslims know that the Islamic ideas in the Quran and the Sunnah are infinitely more superior to the wit or humor (or in your case guidance) your beloved Oscar Wild could ever produce. This may be news to you, but it takes more than eating your mums curry to make you Muslim. Anyway, I just watched the video of you getting trounced by Imran Wahid in the debate ‘Should Hizb ut-Tahrir be proscribed?’ so I suggest you stop trying to gain attention by offering open debates to attempt to agitate Brother Yusuf who I would think, has better things to do with his time. Who the heck are you anyway? Why should anyone give you a platform? You don’t represent anything.
By the way Br. Yusuf’s point about you being a liar is to do with the frequent inaccuracies you have in your ‘facts’ used again and again in your articles. One could say that if you were doing this intentionally unless your dumb or you really are an uncle-tom that you would be actually lying. If its neither of these things then most Muslims can safely assume that the only person your deceiving is yourself.
Posted by: Moin Al-Islam | January 28, 2006 4:02 AM
Shiv,
your a snake trying to make a name for yourself. You don't have the knowledge to debate the Islamic ideology let alone the intelligence to defend your own views.
According to your poor understanding of logic, the Labour party should be banned because people who participate in leftist politics eventually become animal rights extremists. Or those who join the Conservative party eventually join the far right.
You clearly have an agenda to glorify your name and it will be...in shit.
Posted by: islamtech | April 21, 2006 6:39 PM
Mr Shiv
You are simply a guy who wants to make a name for himself. And the angle u wish to use is Hizb ut-tahrir.
So now u will sensationalise HT and hope they get mentioned in papers etc so that u can be called upon as some sort of expert.
Well thats a load of bollocks. I mean what was your article regarding "HT people working in top jobs" all about. Should they be on the dole.
Please Shiv can u respond to that
Posted by: AM | April 30, 2006 12:59 AM
Shiv is a knob.
Posted by: anon | March 13, 2007 5:35 PM