Asim Siddiqui on Muna Fuzai
Comment is free: Crescent Muna
Asim Siddiqui (chairman of the City Circle) presents the ideas of Muna al-Fuzai, a Kuwaiti businesswoman and journalist "who is on a mission to not only project a better image of Islam and Muslims globally but also - and this bit's important - to promote a balanced and more refined (many would say more classical) interpretation of Islam that espouses science, culture, art and knowledge and counters the extremist narrative so freely available from hate preachers and over the internet":
Mrs al-Fuzai is emerging as a popular figure among the young and the women of Kuwait with her writings in the Kuwait Times highlighting how women are abused, migrant workers mistreated and the weak generally exploited in Kuwaiti society. She also highlights the need for greater democracy in Kuwait and across the Middle East.
What makes Muna so interesting is that she also enjoys the ear of the emirate's rulers, which means that not only can she be neither deported nor silenced but she also has the clout to carry out changes. Her fire is directed not at the government (understandably) but on the social norms and customs of the patriarchal societies that dominate the landscape.
I did a Google search for Ms Fuzai's writings, and I found a piece here at the Kuwait Times about child abuse, this one from Kuwait News (via "The Sisterhood") about transsexuals and this one about tricks Arabic speakers in Kuwait play on foreigners.
Also, City Circle has a debate this Friday evening in London (6:45-8:30pm, 45 Crawford Place, London W1 - off Edgware Road) on the topic of whether "Islam is incompatble with liberalism", involving Alice Kneen (of Magdalen College, Cambridge, proposing) and Dr Richard Stone (Commission on British Muslims and Islamophobia, opposing). No doubt there will be a fair number of bigots attending, so lets have lots of our folks to make up the numbers!
Comments
No doubt there will be a fair number of bigots attending, so lets have lots of our folks to make up the numbers!
What kind of reason is that?
Posted by: Shamil | May 31, 2006 4:54 PM
What part of classical Islam ever accecpted the evil of sex changes and cross-dressing? Sounds more like someone more influenced by the deviants of our time than by Islam.
Posted by: Umar Lee | May 31, 2006 5:10 PM
Well, let's make sure that the bigots do not hijack any debate (I'm not talking about attending in order to beat them up if that's what you read).
Posted by: Yusuf Smith
|
May 31, 2006 5:10 PM
What part of classical Islam ever accecpted the evil of sex changes and cross-dressing?
I think some scholars have permitted sex changes actually.I know they're allowed in Iran.
Well, let's make sure that the bigots do not hijack any debate
What bigots?
Hijack in what sense?
Posted by: Shamil | May 31, 2006 5:22 PM
"Scholars"? What are they basing that ruling on ? Something they pulled out of the behind? I know it is tougher in Europe to maintain traditional Islamic values than in the States.
Posted by: Umar Lee | May 31, 2006 6:19 PM
I know it is tougher in Europe to maintain traditional Islamic values than in the States.
I was in one of the Gulf states I think actually
Posted by: Shamil | May 31, 2006 6:54 PM
I think some scholars have permitted sex changes actually.I know they're allowed in Iran.
If I lived in Iran, I'd have a sex change just to get treated like a human being.
I'm all for an Islam that espouses science, art, culture and knowledge. Ironic, though, that in so many Muslim countries people are not allowed to advocate one.
Posted by: Old Pickler | May 31, 2006 7:13 PM
Of course Islam is incompatible with Liberalism, an ideology that allows people to become monsters in their private sphere and then is astonished when people's perversions burst out and impinge on others.
But i'm sure the City Circle which doesn't see the need for a Muslim voice on issues and is willing to sacrifice all sacred cows (not Hindu ones, mind) will be trying to suggest otherwise.
Posted by: Ismaeel | May 31, 2006 9:06 PM
(If I lived in Iran, I'd have a sex change just to get treated like a human being.)
You'd need a brain transplant. Too bad you cant grow a personality.
(I'm all for an Islam that espouses science, art, culture and knowledge. )
Islam already does that, you retarded twit.
Posted by: DrM | May 31, 2006 9:59 PM
If I lived in Iran, I'd have a sex change just to get treated like a human being.
Is that the only reason?
Posted by: Shamil | May 31, 2006 9:59 PM
Seriously though it seems OP is returning to her(?) standard rhetorical catch phrases having been shown to know jack about her own supposed religion.
Posted by: Shamil | May 31, 2006 10:06 PM
Was Muna al-Fuzai talking about people born with both organs or is she talking about a straight forward case of man wants to be woman(or vice-versa)?
Posted by: H | May 31, 2006 10:07 PM
That thing about the sex change was a joke. You know? Joke.
As regards art and science, it is funny that some Muslims posting here get all prickly about my factual observation that Muna Al-Fuzai has to come to the West to say things that are critical of Muslims. Self-criticism is key to both art and science. Maybe, just maybe, the Muslim world could learn a thing or two from the tradition of questioning that we have here. Muna would probably agree with me.
Posted by: Old Pickler | May 31, 2006 11:39 PM
That thing about the sex change was a joke. You know? Joke.
And this would be distinct from the rest what you write how?
Self-criticism is key to both art and science.
This is what I mean. You're just saying these things because they sound good without thinking about them.
Are you saying the art in the Sistine Chapel or the Vatican is supposed to be critical of Christianity?
Art can be self critical but that isn't what makes it art.
Secondly science has nothing to do with self criticism. Man did things like build irrigation systems or domesticate animals to make his life easier.Self criticism is about making your life harder in a sense.
Posted by: Shamil | June 1, 2006 9:25 AM
Assalaamu alaikum,
I live in Kuwait and I can't say I've ever heard of this woman.... unless it's the one who used to write a column in another English newspaper. This is so typical, though; people like this always go to the West and claim that they're doing something unprecedented, and they're accepted as heroes because no one knows any better. And the English-language newspapers are read by people from the West, the Indian subcontinent, and Southeast Asia, so they're writing what's popular among them. Unless her column in also in the Arabic newspaper, I can't see how she can really be so popular with young Kuwaitis.
The idea that Kuwait is just starting to have internal debate, "joining the new club" of countries like Bahrain and Qatar, is ridiculous. Kuwait is well-known for having the most free press in the region; since I came 15 years ago, I've been amazed at the openness and criticism of the government. For years, they've been showing National Assembly sessions on TV, and they're full of fiery debate.
And apparently Mr. Siddiqui doesn't realize it - and I guess Muna al-Fuzai had no interest in mentioning it - but Kuwait already has many powerful, prominent, educated women - including many who are very knowledgeable about Islam. These are women who actually are well-known and making a diference, masha'allah.
I read the column about Arabic speakers taking advantage of non-Arabic speakers, and it turned out to have nothing to do with language skills. A Filipina had an Arabic-speaking boyfriend and he dumped her later; what does that have to do with anything? A lot of Filipinas have lived here for a while and speak Arabic, and they still have boyfriends and get dumped.
As for Natasha, well, I don't know how she dresses and acts, but some other Gulf countries are full of Russian prostitutes; in fact, they're known as "Natashas", I think. This might explain why she's sometimes propositioned.
As for the transsexual, we had one well-known case of a man who went to Bangkok and had operations to become a woman. He went to court to legally change, but they wouldn't alow it - and his father was one of the ones fighting against him. Sorry, but in a society like this where men and women often are separated, no one wants this. (In Iran, it's more common, and apparently their scholars have approved it in some cases.) But when I'm in the ladies room, or among women where we think we can take off our niqabs or hijabs, I don't want a man with me.
If she's writing about mistreatment of laborers, etc., that's good, but she's certainly not alone in that either.
Posted by: Ann
|
June 3, 2006 10:08 PM