<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Atat&#252;rk&#8217;s wife&#8217;s hijab</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2007/05/05/atatrks_wifes_hijab/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2007/05/05/atatrks_wifes_hijab</link>
	<description>Politics, tech and media issues from a Muslim perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:34:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2007/05/05/atatrks_wifes_hijab#comment-1379</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 11:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogistan.co.uk/ijwp/mt.php/2007/05/05/atatrks_wifes_hijab#comment-1379</guid>
		<description>Maybe you need to take heed of your own rules.

Comments insulting Islam, bad language, school-yard insults and personal insults are unsuitable, and people submitting them should expect refusal, alteration (clearly marked) or deletion. This applies to Muslims as to everyone else. Persistent offenders will be banned.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you need to take heed of your own rules.</p>

<p>Comments insulting Islam, bad language, school-yard insults and personal insults are unsuitable, and people submitting them should expect refusal, alteration (clearly marked) or deletion. This applies to Muslims as to everyone else. Persistent offenders will be banned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2007/05/05/atatrks_wifes_hijab#comment-1378</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 13:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogistan.co.uk/ijwp/mt.php/2007/05/05/atatrks_wifes_hijab#comment-1378</guid>
		<description>Another offended Turk. If other Muslims are going to use insulting words against Turks then it seems that an old Turkish saying &quot;The only friend of a Turk is a Turk&quot; is true. Yusuf remove your slander.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another offended Turk. If other Muslims are going to use insulting words against Turks then it seems that an old Turkish saying &#8220;The only friend of a Turk is a Turk&#8221; is true. Yusuf remove your slander.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kazan</title>
		<link>http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2007/05/05/atatrks_wifes_hijab#comment-1377</link>
		<dc:creator>Kazan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 12:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogistan.co.uk/ijwp/mt.php/2007/05/05/atatrks_wifes_hijab#comment-1377</guid>
		<description>Yes i can say i am offended by associating Turk eith jerk this just reminds me of all the racist Turk bashing that went on in the newspapers like the Sun when Turkey palyed England at football, if this blog is degrading into using words from trash newspapers i wont be reading it anymore i think an appology should be issued
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes i can say i am offended by associating Turk eith jerk this just reminds me of all the racist Turk bashing that went on in the newspapers like the Sun when Turkey palyed England at football, if this blog is degrading into using words from trash newspapers i wont be reading it anymore i think an appology should be issued</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H</title>
		<link>http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2007/05/05/atatrks_wifes_hijab#comment-1376</link>
		<dc:creator>H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 09:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogistan.co.uk/ijwp/mt.php/2007/05/05/atatrks_wifes_hijab#comment-1376</guid>
		<description>Yusuf, stop rhyming the word Turk with Jerk, you&#039;ll only upset your Turkish readers (like me)!

But seriously, the way Ataturk saw it, it wasn&#039;t so much the hijab that he disliked, but more the niqab. Obviously he would rather have got rid of the lot, but the situation was different back then. This was said as much in his biography by Lord Kinross, where emancipation of women meant removing the veil but not necessarily the hijab. I remeber seeing a picture in that book where a Turkish feminist and supporter of Ataturk named Halide Edip, addressed a large gathering wearing the hijab (this was around the time of the war of Turkish independance or maybe afterwards), and that was sort of radical back then seeing as how most women wore the veil.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yusuf, stop rhyming the word Turk with Jerk, you&#8217;ll only upset your Turkish readers (like me)!</p>

<p>But seriously, the way Ataturk saw it, it wasn&#8217;t so much the hijab that he disliked, but more the niqab. Obviously he would rather have got rid of the lot, but the situation was different back then. This was said as much in his biography by Lord Kinross, where emancipation of women meant removing the veil but not necessarily the hijab. I remeber seeing a picture in that book where a Turkish feminist and supporter of Ataturk named Halide Edip, addressed a large gathering wearing the hijab (this was around the time of the war of Turkish independance or maybe afterwards), and that was sort of radical back then seeing as how most women wore the veil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
