Review of Littlejohn’s “War on Jews”

Technorati Tags:

Yesterday evening, the well-known talk-show host and newspaper columnist Richard Littlejohn presented an hour-long documentary, as part of Channel 4’s Dispatches feature, entitled “The War On British Jews?”, purporting to demonstrate that “in Britain 2007, it’s open season on the Jews”. You can see it in a series of YouTube videos here. The programme made a number of familiar points, among them that the Left, despite its anti-racist reputation, was “pouring petrol on the flames”, and demonstrated a rather lackadaisical investigation.

His first interview is with a Rabbi who had, he said, “fallen victim to the new wave of anti-Semitism”:

Rabbi: It happened on a Friday night; I was invited to a friend to eat, and about 10:30, it was time to go home. As I crossed the road, fifteen youths came round the corner, I didn’t think much of it because I’ve never been attacked before, but as they came nearer and nearer, I got more and more concerned, they came at me suddenly with their legs and arms flying. They then surrounded me like hyaenas, simply kicking me for the fun of it.

RL: The beating became more frenzied, even more vicious, the noise attracting the attention of neighbours.

Rabbi: Full force, fifteen youths pushed me over, and I went flying onto my arm, onto the ground and something snapped.

RL: By the time the neighbours had frightened off the gang, the rabbi’s arm and collarbone were broken. The police were in no doubt as to why he was attacked.

Rabbi: Simply because I was a Jewish man, they attacked me, and in the back of your mind, you’re thinking to yourself, “what does it mean, an anti-Semitic attack? It means that simply because you’re perceived as something different to them, they have put you in agony for two and a half months”.

RL: Is it your sense that anti-Semitism in Britain is on the rise again?

Rabbi: Yes. I was hoping that the Jewish people would be so integrated that this thing wouldn’t happen again, but unfortunately it has turned its ugly head.

Curiously missing from this interview is any evidence that this attack was racially motivated other than that the victim was Jewish. There is no reference to the ethnicity or apparent religion of the attackers, or even whether they made any anti-Semitic remarks. Surely, if either factor was present, it would have been noted, but no evidence is presented that this was anything other than a mindless bit of violence by a gang of senseless yobs. Such attacks do happen (the “South Bank happy slappings”, in which a man died, spring to mind) and not all of the victims were Jewish. And while the daubing of Jewish graves with swastikas and SS symbols give no doubt as to who is responsible, people who attack Jews in the streets may be motivated by the same thing as those who attack Goths or anyone else who looks different: a hatred of anyone different from them, particularly if they look weak or intellectual.

Much of the rest of the programme was flippant and without any fresh insight. He pokes fun at Muslim boycotts of Israeli supporting businesses, remarking that the list of companies to boycott takes in most of the British high street, and presents a map of the Middle East, making the usual remark that Israel is a tiny strip of land, while the Arabs have the whole of the rest of the Middle East and nowhere else in the region is a functioning democracy - an irrelevance, since the rest of the Arab world belongs to the Arabs who live there (and whose ancestors lived there before they became Arabs), not to the Palestinian Arabs - and he did not bother to mention that many of the undemocratic régimes which exist in the Arab and Muslim world are western clients.

And the biggest laugh of the whole programme was when Littlejohn told us we shouldn’t hold Jews in this country accountable for what Israel does because we don’t hold Muslims responsible for what Muslim countries (he named a couple, but I can’t remember) do. Really, he must not have got out much (and remember, this guy lives in Florida). It’s routinely demanded of Muslims, with a threatening overtone, that we condemn the terrorists, and I have seen the policies of various Muslim countries used as a weapon against Muslims in general more than a few times (including in objections to mosque building applications). I can’t remember the last time I heard it said that Jews have to condemn this action or that by Israel with an “or else” subtext (admittedly the Israelis have not bombed the UK, although their agents are known to have operated here, for such purposes as luring a former state employee to Italy to be kidnapped, and they bombed civilian areas in Lebanon last year when there were British tourists in the country). In fact, Jewish leaders in the UK have rallied support for Israel, including during last year’s Lebanon war.

I don’t have the time or energy to go through the programme with a fine-tooth comb, but it certainly did not even come close to proving that it was “open season” on Jews in the UK. Richard Littlejohn is not known as an investigative reporter at all; he is known as a loud-mouthed talk show host. If there really has been a rise in genuine anti-Semitism, rather than just of stupid yobs attacking Jews in the street because they are different coinciding with a rise in anger against Israel, this would have been a legitimate subject for a documentary, hosted by a serious journalist, which this man is not. He should not be allowed to investigate a leaky roof in his house - leave it to the professionals, Richard.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Possibly Related Posts:


FacebookTwitterIdenti.caDeliciousDiggStumbleUponWordPressShare
ReviewsPermalink
  • Shamil

    From what I’ve heard most abuse against Orthodox jews comes from “chavs”. Maybe they should have got Julie Burchill to explain since she’s both a philo-semite and a defender of chavs.

  • layla

    Your policies state: Comments insulting Islam, bad language, school-yard insults and personal insults are unsuitable, and people submitting them should expect refusal, alteration (clearly marked) or deletion. This applies to Muslims as to everyone else. Persistent offenders will be banned.

    so why do you always diss the murabitun where ever and when ever you possilby can? It distresses me because I generally enjoy your comments about things but then i come across your insults and it really lowers the tone. Your cheap shots make it look like you need to be a bully in order to bolster your opinion. its very low of you, may Allah forgive you amin.

  • http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/ Yusuf Smith

    As-Salaamu ‘alaikum,

    I don’t diss the Murabitun whenever and wherever I can; I’ve made a few posts in the past with reasoned criticism of the group’s behaviour and teachings, based on my own observations and my readings of some of their publications. I’m not conscious of having made cheap shots or bullying anyone.

  • Old Pickler

    admittedly the Israelis have not bombed the UK

    Neither have any Jews. That’s the point.

    While we should not - and do not - hold British Muslims responsible for what Iran (say) does in arming Hezbollah, it is fair to note the hysteria about Israel’s actions, set against the deafening silence about Darfur, the stoning of rape victims and so forth.

    Proportionally far more Jews are attacked than Muslims in the UK.

    Has any British Jew attacked a British Muslim? Have any Jews been seen on our streets chanting “Death to the Muslims”?

    I thought the documentary was excellent and long overdue. Its target was mainly leftist rather than Muslim anti-Semitism.

  • Shamilaskov

    Proportionally far more Jews are attacked than Muslims in the UK.

    Evidence?

    Has any British Jew attacked a British Muslim? Have any Jews been seen on our streets chanting “Death to the Muslims”?

    Are these rhetorical questions or do you actually have an answer to them?

    I thought the documentary was excellent and long overdue.

    Even if the point it was trying to make had been serious it would have still been discredited by the fact that Littlejohn had no idea what he was talking about (e.g. stating that the “protocals” had been discredited decades ago)

    Its target was mainly leftist rather than Muslim anti-Semitism.

    Wrong again. It clearly spent more time on the Far Right than either of the other two. Did you actually watch it?

    By the way if you’re so concerned about anti-semitism maybe you should stop reading the Spectator as Taki Theodoracopulos pretty much admits that he is an anti-semite.

  • Judge Dredd

    layla, where have the Murabitun been alluded to in the article?

  • Old Pickler

    Proportionally far more Jews are attacked than Muslims in the UK.

    Evidence?

    The Telegraph,17.12.06 (I understand Yusuf doesn’t let us post links, but you can google:

    “Jewish people are four times more likely to be attacked because of their religion than Muslims, according to figures compiled by the police.

    One in 400 Jews compared to one in 1,700 Muslims are likely to be victims of “faith hate” attacks every year. The figure is based on data collected over three months in police areas accounting for half the Muslim and Jewish populations of England and Wales. The crimes range from assault and verbal abuse to criminal damage at places of worship.”

    Has any British Jew attacked a British Muslim? Have any Jews been seen on our streets chanting “Death to the Muslims”?

    Are these rhetorical questions or do you actually have an answer to them?

    They are genuine questions. The answer, to the best of my knowledge is no. If anyone knows different, please say. Obviously something “not happening” eg old lady mugging young man, doesn’t get reported, so I can’t point to evidence of Jews not attacking Muslims.

    On your last point, as you say, the Far Right were not spared, and that is why, even if you think Littlejohn is a prat, you should not associate him with scum like the BNP.

  • Shamil

    The Telegraph,17.12.06 (I understand Yusuf doesn’t let us post links, but you can google:

    “Jewish people are four times more likely to be attacked because of their religion than Muslims, according to figures compiled by the police.

    One in 400 Jews compared to one in 1,700 Muslims are likely to be victims of “faith hate” attacks every year. The figure is based on data collected over three months in police areas accounting for half the Muslim and Jewish populations of England and Wales. The crimes range from assault and verbal abuse to criminal damage at places of worship.”

    I read that report before and I’m quite skeptical of a report that directly compares two groups that aren’t really interlinked in anyway. Also when they say jews do they mean generic jews or religious jews. That makes a huge difference because if they just mean religious jews then the figures may well be correct. However that has quite wide implications as visibly religious jews are a very small percentage of jews in general and so it wouldn’t be correct to speak of widespread anti-semitic attacks. In the same way I’m sure visibly religious muslims are attacked more than non-visibly religious muslims.

    They are genuine questions. The answer, to the best of my knowledge is no. If anyone knows different, please say. Obviously something “not happening” eg old lady mugging young man, doesn’t get reported, so I can’t point to evidence of Jews not attacking Muslims.

    Well I’ve heard of attacks on muslims by jews in America including attempted terrorist attacks. As far as Britain goes I haven’t heard of jews attacking muslims but I also haven’t heard of muslims attacking jews. That doesn’t prove that neither is happening.

    On your last point, as you say, the Far Right were not spared, and that is why, even if you think Littlejohn is a prat, you should not associate him with scum like the BNP.

    I don’t think he’s Far Right I just think he’s a loud mouth who wants attention and doesn’t know what he’s talking about. It’s become very fashionable on the centre right to express their horror at anti-semitism to the extent that in many cases its clearly half hearted and done merely as a kind of right of passage. The worst example I’ve seen of this was Peter Hitchens who basically said that Left-wing anti-semitism was worse than Right-wing anti-semitism because it was from the Left.

  • Old Pickler

    In the same way I’m sure visibly religious muslims are attacked more than non-visibly religious muslims.

    The report compares Jews, religious or not to Muslims, religious or not.

    Peter Hitchens who basically said that Left-wing anti-semitism was worse than Right-wing anti-semitism because it was from the Left.

    No, his argument is that Left-wing anti-semitism is more hypocritical because the left is holier than thou about racism and quick to see it anywhere except against the Jews.

    I hope that everyone posting here agrees that anti-Semitism is a bad thing. If it is on the rise, and the evidence from the police is that it is, a straightforward condemnation would be good to hear, instead of the usual pattern of denial - it’s not really happening but if it is it’s because of Israel.

    There have been documentaries about “Islamophobia”, a concept that I don’t accept and attacks and abuse of Muslims, a fact which I do accept and condemn. So why does one about Jews lead to automatic defensiveness and scepticism?

  • Shamil

    The report compares Jews, religious or not to Muslims, religious or not.

    I don’t know what you’re basing that assumption on but if its true then I don’t accept the figures.

    I hope that everyone posting here agrees that anti-Semitism is a bad thing.

    I don’t accept the term. It comes from a time when jews were the only minority (and the only semites) in Europe. I don’t see that it has any relevance today. After all we don’t call racism towards blacks a specific name even though there have been racially motivated murders against them. I’m against the concept of race totally.Whether its being used in a positive or negative way.

    it’s not really happening but if it is it’s because of Israel.

    Littlejohn and the ones he interviewed said it was because of Israel. I personally doubt whether the far-right or random chavs care too much about Israel.

    There have been documentaries about “Islamophobia”,

    The only one I can recall is the one by Kenan Malik which said that it didn’t exist. Personally I don’t care either way but you can’t really compare that to something with a title like “The War on Britain’s Jews”.

    So why does one about Jews lead to automatic defensiveness and scepticism?

    Because it compares race based desecration of graves with criticism of a foreign country.

  • DrM

    Sounds like a laughable farce. Just pointing out zionist terrorism and its supporters and all of a sudden its “open season on jews.” Please. pRickler and co. support attacks in all forms on Muslims, so its obvious why they don’t “believe” Islamophobia exists.

  • George Carty

    I liken “anti-Semitism” meaning “anti-Jewish racism” to positive-to-negative “conventional current”. Wrong, but too well-entrenched to correct.

  • Old Pickler

    pRickler and co. support attacks in all forms on Muslims, so its obvious why they don’t “believe” Islamophobia exists.

    Wrong. I don’t support any blanket attacks on Muslims, even verbal ones. Though if a Muslim does something I disagree with or commits a crime, he shouldn’t be shielded from criticism on grounds of “islamophobia”.

    Criticism of and attacks on Islam - and Christianity, Judaism etc - are fine, and must be countered - with words.

  • http://everythingiselectric.blogspot.com Katy Newton

    If there really has been a rise in genuine anti-Semitism, rather than just of stupid yobs attacking Jews in the street because they are different coinciding with a rise in anger against Israel,

    Presumably there is a similar difference between “genuine Islamophobia” and “a bunch of stupid yobs attacking a Muslim in the street because they are different coinciding with a rise in anger against Israel”, which you will remind us about the next time a Muslim is attacked for, apparently, no reason other than that he was Muslim?

    I am not sure why so many Muslims think they have to set out to prove that hatred of Jews is on the rise in this country in the face of the findings of the police and of the All-Party Parliamentary Inquiry into Antisemitism, but it depresses me that distrust of Jews is now so high in the Muslim community in this country that they cannot countenance the idea that Jews may also be on the receiving end of prejudice. This post left a very nasty taste in my mouth.

  • Judge Dredd

    “Criticism of and attacks on Islam - and Christianity, Judaism etc - are fine, and must be countered - with words”

    Stating that attacks on Islam are fine and then shielding ones extremist views with “Judaism” and “Christianity” is exactly the kind of attitude that spurs on thugs to commit violence against Muslims. I really think that our British Stasi should pick up on such posters and harrass/arrest them rather than innocent Muslims.

  • http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/ Yusuf Smith

    Re: Katy Newton’s comment

    I think that if Muslims were being attacked by mindless yobs in the streets then it would be a cause of concern and that there would be debate as to whether it was racist or Islamophobic or just plain yob violence. Littlejohn’s documentary was about political anti-Semitism and placed an attack on a rabbi in the streets next to this, without presenting any evidence of a link, such as whether racist taunts were used or even any profile of the attackers - and surely, if Littlejohn could find an incident of an attack on a Jew or group of Jews which was obviously politically motivated and obviously linked to anger at Jewish support for Israel, he would have used that. I wonder how many chavs read the New Statesman or the MPACUK website? They are more likely to read the Sun which isn’t exactly a hotbed of criticism of Israel.

  • DrM

    Tsk Tsk. Don’t lie, pRickler. You support terrorism against Iraqis and Palestinians. Your so called criticism is nothing but a smokescreen for hatred of all things Muslim. If there is any criminality here, its that of you and your fellow bigots.

  • http://marranci.wordpress.com Dr Marranci

    Thanks for your post. I have a a reply to Littlejohn’s documentary in my Blog, Here

    Please, feel free to visit and comment

    Best wishes Gabriele

    marranci.wordpress.com