<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nick Cohen on Saudi money power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2007/09/25/nick_cohen_on_saudi_money_power/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2007/09/25/nick_cohen_on_saudi_money_power</link>
	<description>Politics, tech and media issues from a Muslim perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thersites</title>
		<link>http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2007/09/25/nick_cohen_on_saudi_money_power#comment-1824</link>
		<dc:creator>Thersites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogistan.co.uk/ijwp/mt.php/2007/09/25/nick_cohen_on_saudi_money_power#comment-1824</guid>
		<description>The sentences cited in Undercover Mosque would sound pretty appalling in any context. It would be useful if they transcribed the full speeches they came from so we can see for ourselves. According to the new Priavte Eye, a chap called Sheikh Khalid bin Mahfouz has been waging jihad via the British libel laws and the Observer panicked over a piece about him  by Cohen recently.
More on his methids here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.indexcomment.org/index.php/site/comments/the_true_cost_of_libel/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.indexcomment.org/index.php/site/comments/the_true_cost_of_libel/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.indexcomment.org/index.php/site/comments/the_true_cost_of_libel/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sentences cited in Undercover Mosque would sound pretty appalling in any context. It would be useful if they transcribed the full speeches they came from so we can see for ourselves. According to the new Priavte Eye, a chap called Sheikh Khalid bin Mahfouz has been waging jihad via the British libel laws and the Observer panicked over a piece about him  by Cohen recently.
More on his methids here: <a href="http://www.indexcomment.org/index.php/site/comments/the_true_cost_of_libel/"></a><a href="http://www.indexcomment.org/index.php/site/comments/the_true_cost_of_libel/">http://www.indexcomment.org/index.php/site/comments/the<em>true</em>cost<em>of</em>libel/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shamil</title>
		<link>http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2007/09/25/nick_cohen_on_saudi_money_power#comment-1823</link>
		<dc:creator>Shamil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogistan.co.uk/ijwp/mt.php/2007/09/25/nick_cohen_on_saudi_money_power#comment-1823</guid>
		<description>Nick Cohen is an insecure fantasist who having converted to &quot;Liberal Hawkism&quot; now has to come out with these ridiculous articles instead of admitting that he was wrong about Iraq.


I think comparing issues over Saudi weapons deals with missionary activity funded by Saudi private citizens shows he has absolutely no idea what he&#039;s talking about. I&#039;d be astonished if actually knows what wahhabism is.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick Cohen is an insecure fantasist who having converted to &#8220;Liberal Hawkism&#8221; now has to come out with these ridiculous articles instead of admitting that he was wrong about Iraq.</p>

<p>I think comparing issues over Saudi weapons deals with missionary activity funded by Saudi private citizens shows he has absolutely no idea what he&#8217;s talking about. I&#8217;d be astonished if actually knows what wahhabism is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

