So we lost

| 3 Comments | No TrackBacks

If anyone's not heard yet, the England team lost a football match against Croatia last week, which means England won't be in the Euro 2008 tournament next year. Boo hoo. The manager (Steve McClaren) resigned the next day. Now they're hunting round for anyone who will have the job, which nobody seems to. People seemed to be pinning their hopes on José Mourinho, who had already said, months ago, that he did not want to manage England or any national side other than his own (Portugal).

To be honest, I don't care about football much and the fact that next year there will be nobody sitting screaming in front of the telly at footballers who cannot hear them doesn't make me lose any sleep. The problem is, though, that the age of big-money football has brought about a Premiership which no longer nurtures native talent. Many of the major Premiership teams rely heavily on imported players, often from countries where football is a route out of the slums. Season ticket prices have been driven up and up, "coincidentally" with the rise in player salaries, making it more difficult for the supporters to regularly see matches; tickets for matches at high-profile clubs cost over £20 (in the case of Premiership clubs, good seats cost much more). (Arsenal, a stone's throw from the City, is notoriously popular with moneyed City types and their ground is known as the Highbury Library, because they are not exactly boisterous supporters; its tickets are sold to registered supporters only.)

Why is this? Could it be the fact that school playing fields are being sold off and that schools are supposedly placing less emphasis on team sports? Or is it that the traditional working-class support base of the game itself is being shut out of it by high ticket prices? It is not just football, though - the England cricket team is not the best of performers on the international stage, famously only winning the Ashes from Australia in 2005 when it had an Australian coach (and I remember the notorious defeat to the semi-professional Zimbabwe team in the mid-1990s). I would call myself a "by-default" cricket man, meaning that it's the only major sport I haven't detested since my school days when both it and football were compulsory, not that I've played it in years or that I've ever been to the Oval for a game, and like most people, I suspect that I really only think about the game when the team wins or, more commonly, loses a big international match. I think both games need to reconnect with their popular base if the national teams are to become winners again.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.blogistan.co.uk/mt4/mt-tb.cgi/3206

3 Comments

Asalaamu alaikum.

It was reported here in the US that the coach was fired (not that he resigned). Which seems pretty lame to me - geez, sometimes you lose and it's not all the coach's fault.

I personally hate the ridiculous emphasis put on sports. Here in the US many disaffected youth think that the only chance they have in life is if they are athletes, and unfortunately this is perpetuated by our schools who give special treatment to athletes (more so to male than female, and only in certain sports) and do not uphold the academic standards that are attached to being able to play.

It sounds like it is different there in the UK, but here athletic programs have the greatest amount of financial support. Even when programs are threatened, it is temporary. I recall when I was in school (15 years ago) there were threats to cut all art/music/drama/newspaper etc classes and extra-curricular activities and we artists were nearly having heart attacks but no one cared. But within 24 hours of the athletic programs being threatened, it was all over the local news, parents were picketing in front of the school, and bake/raffle sales were being put on. Christmas trees are traditionally sold in front of the high schools and the money goes to fund the Athletic Boosters. Everyone bonds together over supporting our athletes...

What about the fact that the British working class itself has been devastated by globalization?

As-Salaamu 'alaikum sis Aaminah,

You're right - he was sacked. However, very often there's no difference - people "get resigned", i.e. resign when their position becomes untenable, which is what I assumed happened. But no, he was dismissed, as all the reports said.

Leave a comment

Archives

OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID
Powered by Movable Type 4.2-en