<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interview with &#8216;Shaikh&#8217; Faisal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2008/06/22/interview_with_shaikh_faisal/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2008/06/22/interview_with_shaikh_faisal</link>
	<description>Politics, tech and media issues from a Muslim perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: yusuf</title>
		<link>http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2008/06/22/interview_with_shaikh_faisal#comment-725</link>
		<dc:creator>yusuf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogistan.co.uk/ijwp/mt.php/2008/06/22/interview_with_shaikh_faisal#comment-725</guid>
		<description>ppps,

Do you realise that you have ads with links through to christian preacher websites popping up on your blog?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ppps,</p>

<p>Do you realise that you have ads with links through to christian preacher websites popping up on your blog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yusuf</title>
		<link>http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2008/06/22/interview_with_shaikh_faisal#comment-724</link>
		<dc:creator>yusuf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 13:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogistan.co.uk/ijwp/mt.php/2008/06/22/interview_with_shaikh_faisal#comment-724</guid>
		<description>sa, pps..!

I just read the Salafi attack on the sheikh, and it is the usual, no evidence based argument, bit like HT.... twisting the words of the sheikh.

Also, he is fallible, so when everyone is refering to you as a muslim cleric, it is easy to then refer to yourself as one. This is one of their evidences that he is munafiq! The funny thing is that these peopl who write this are defending their own hypocracy!.

Subhanallah. The decent scholars will always be fought, it is a sunnah of allah.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sa, pps..!</p>

<p>I just read the Salafi attack on the sheikh, and it is the usual, no evidence based argument, bit like HT&#8230;. twisting the words of the sheikh.</p>

<p>Also, he is fallible, so when everyone is refering to you as a muslim cleric, it is easy to then refer to yourself as one. This is one of their evidences that he is munafiq! The funny thing is that these peopl who write this are defending their own hypocracy!.</p>

<p>Subhanallah. The decent scholars will always be fought, it is a sunnah of allah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yusuf</title>
		<link>http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2008/06/22/interview_with_shaikh_faisal#comment-723</link>
		<dc:creator>yusuf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 13:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogistan.co.uk/ijwp/mt.php/2008/06/22/interview_with_shaikh_faisal#comment-723</guid>
		<description>sa, ps,

www.salafimanhaj.com is run by the Saudis, they write refutations ( if you can call them that) of every sheikh that opposes their creed of kufr. They did one for Anwar Al Awlaki, basically their arguments are based on either calling you Khwaarij, casting aspersions based on the idea that only Saud can give &quot;ijaza&quot; lol, or just plain lies. For Sheikh Anwar, they said the Yusuf al Uliery was not a shaheed, that in fact he was killed by the Saudi police, and a criminal. He was actually collecting funds for the Afghanistan Jihad, and was martyred by the Apostate rulers of Saud, who should have been giving him money not their bullets, but its all a mater of opinion and banafit with the Munafiqeen.

The biggest enemies of the muslims these Saudis.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sa, ps,</p>

<p><a href="http://www.salafimanhaj.com">http://www.salafimanhaj.com</a> is run by the Saudis, they write refutations ( if you can call them that) of every sheikh that opposes their creed of kufr. They did one for Anwar Al Awlaki, basically their arguments are based on either calling you Khwaarij, casting aspersions based on the idea that only Saud can give &#8220;ijaza&#8221; lol, or just plain lies. For Sheikh Anwar, they said the Yusuf al Uliery was not a shaheed, that in fact he was killed by the Saudi police, and a criminal. He was actually collecting funds for the Afghanistan Jihad, and was martyred by the Apostate rulers of Saud, who should have been giving him money not their bullets, but its all a mater of opinion and banafit with the Munafiqeen.</p>

<p>The biggest enemies of the muslims these Saudis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yusuf</title>
		<link>http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2008/06/22/interview_with_shaikh_faisal#comment-722</link>
		<dc:creator>yusuf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 13:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogistan.co.uk/ijwp/mt.php/2008/06/22/interview_with_shaikh_faisal#comment-722</guid>
		<description>Asalamu alaikum wa rahmatulah brother in Islam!

We met the other day in the Morrocan market stall, with my mum.

Interesting blog. I read you piece on sheikh faisal, the term &quot;extreme wahabi&quot; is a little harsh, dont you think? I have listened to most of his lectures, and he seems to nail it every time. For example the revival of the Islamic concept of Walaah and Barah is very important in these times. The one who denies Allah cannot be loved, and you cannot be indifferent to the Kuffar arming themselves, and their agents to fight the Muslims. The Saudi salafi talk he did is my personal favourite. And of course was one of the many reasons they wanted him behind bars.

You will find in todays climate that we are in a great situation brother. We have the ability to walk the path of the sahaba. The difference is we have all of the Quran in one hit, and we are commanded to forbid the munkar and enjoin the good. As Muslims we should not feel comfortable inthis situation of Kufr all around us. Im sure you have read milestones, another good one is &quot;The criterion of the freinds of allah and the freinds of shaitan&quot; by Ibn Taymiyyah. You can get it on pdf of the web. Its thick with evidencesfrom quran and the Hadith.

I also read the piece on HT. Made me laugh. brought back memories of standing outside a talk everyone with a fag on the go! &quot;Khilafah is the answer bruv&quot;. They remind me of the group in that hateful film I saw before i was Muslim. Life of Brian. The peoples front of Judea.

I would be interested to hear where you stand on the important matter of making the word of Allah the highest. This is the role of the Muslims in dunya, and everyone has their ideas on how and why, and its something i have been pursuing for 2 years. As the Ashari scholar said in a book i read somewhere, &quot;I have delved into a sea of knowledge, swimming to its depths, and now i die with the aqeedah of an old woman&quot; or something like that.... may allah save us from this.

check my blog out, havent done anything on it for ages but its got some good links to online documentaries and lectures like chomsky etc.

salamu alaikum
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Asalamu alaikum wa rahmatulah brother in Islam!</p>

<p>We met the other day in the Morrocan market stall, with my mum.</p>

<p>Interesting blog. I read you piece on sheikh faisal, the term &#8220;extreme wahabi&#8221; is a little harsh, dont you think? I have listened to most of his lectures, and he seems to nail it every time. For example the revival of the Islamic concept of Walaah and Barah is very important in these times. The one who denies Allah cannot be loved, and you cannot be indifferent to the Kuffar arming themselves, and their agents to fight the Muslims. The Saudi salafi talk he did is my personal favourite. And of course was one of the many reasons they wanted him behind bars.</p>

<p>You will find in todays climate that we are in a great situation brother. We have the ability to walk the path of the sahaba. The difference is we have all of the Quran in one hit, and we are commanded to forbid the munkar and enjoin the good. As Muslims we should not feel comfortable inthis situation of Kufr all around us. Im sure you have read milestones, another good one is &#8220;The criterion of the freinds of allah and the freinds of shaitan&#8221; by Ibn Taymiyyah. You can get it on pdf of the web. Its thick with evidencesfrom quran and the Hadith.</p>

<p>I also read the piece on HT. Made me laugh. brought back memories of standing outside a talk everyone with a fag on the go! &#8220;Khilafah is the answer bruv&#8221;. They remind me of the group in that hateful film I saw before i was Muslim. Life of Brian. The peoples front of Judea.</p>

<p>I would be interested to hear where you stand on the important matter of making the word of Allah the highest. This is the role of the Muslims in dunya, and everyone has their ideas on how and why, and its something i have been pursuing for 2 years. As the Ashari scholar said in a book i read somewhere, &#8220;I have delved into a sea of knowledge, swimming to its depths, and now i die with the aqeedah of an old woman&#8221; or something like that&#8230;. may allah save us from this.</p>

<p>check my blog out, havent done anything on it for ages but its got some good links to online documentaries and lectures like chomsky etc.</p>

<p>salamu alaikum</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: istanbulnotconstantinople</title>
		<link>http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2008/06/22/interview_with_shaikh_faisal#comment-721</link>
		<dc:creator>istanbulnotconstantinople</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 22:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogistan.co.uk/ijwp/mt.php/2008/06/22/interview_with_shaikh_faisal#comment-721</guid>
		<description>The over riding emotion when listening to his speechs is one of laughter . The fact that anyone takes his absurd often totally contradictory statements seriously is as bizarre as it is frighetning.

Obviously the Salafis arent people to take deen from. But here is a great expose of Feisal

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salafimanhaj.com/pdf/SalafiManhaj_MufteeOfJamaica&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salafimanhaj.com/pdf/SalafiManhaj_MufteeOfJamaica&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.salafimanhaj.com/pdf/SalafiManhaj_MufteeOfJamaica&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The over riding emotion when listening to his speechs is one of laughter . The fact that anyone takes his absurd often totally contradictory statements seriously is as bizarre as it is frighetning.</p>

<p>Obviously the Salafis arent people to take deen from. But here is a great expose of Feisal</p>

<p><a href="http://www.salafimanhaj.com/pdf/SalafiManhaj_MufteeOfJamaica"></a><a href="http://www.salafimanhaj.com/pdf/SalafiManhaj_MufteeOfJamaica">http://www.salafimanhaj.com/pdf/SalafiManhaj_MufteeOfJamaica</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indigo Jo</title>
		<link>http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2008/06/22/interview_with_shaikh_faisal#comment-720</link>
		<dc:creator>Indigo Jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 11:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogistan.co.uk/ijwp/mt.php/2008/06/22/interview_with_shaikh_faisal#comment-720</guid>
		<description>No.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dynamic</title>
		<link>http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2008/06/22/interview_with_shaikh_faisal#comment-719</link>
		<dc:creator>Dynamic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 10:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogistan.co.uk/ijwp/mt.php/2008/06/22/interview_with_shaikh_faisal#comment-719</guid>
		<description>Brother are you Brelwi?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brother are you Brelwi?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indigo Jo</title>
		<link>http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2008/06/22/interview_with_shaikh_faisal#comment-718</link>
		<dc:creator>Indigo Jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 08:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogistan.co.uk/ijwp/mt.php/2008/06/22/interview_with_shaikh_faisal#comment-718</guid>
		<description>The point is that he has been, and his preaching is a matter of public record because of his criminal convictions and his published lectures.  I am not saying he should not be able to travel anywhere, just that (i) the Muslim community should be more careful about whom it allows to lecture in its facilities and (ii) that countries with a history of tension between Muslims and others should not allow people like Faisal (or their equivalents in other religions) in, for obvious reasons.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point is that he has been, and his preaching is a matter of public record because of his criminal convictions and his published lectures.  I am not saying he should not be able to travel anywhere, just that (i) the Muslim community should be more careful about whom it allows to lecture in its facilities and (ii) that countries with a history of tension between Muslims and others should not allow people like Faisal (or their equivalents in other religions) in, for obvious reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thersites</title>
		<link>http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2008/06/22/interview_with_shaikh_faisal#comment-717</link>
		<dc:creator>Thersites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 00:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogistan.co.uk/ijwp/mt.php/2008/06/22/interview_with_shaikh_faisal#comment-717</guid>
		<description>Even if Faisal had not been deported from the U.K. there was nothing to stop him visiting South Africa or Nigeria if their immigration departments  would admit him, unless he was not allowed  to travel abroad at all.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if Faisal had not been deported from the U.K. there was nothing to stop him visiting South Africa or Nigeria if their immigration departments  would admit him, unless he was not allowed  to travel abroad at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

