Somalia: Executing rape victims

Recently a young female was executed for adultery in Kismayo, Somalia. Initially we were told that she was 23, and had gone to the Shabaab militia, who control that part of the country, to confess and to submit to the Shari’a penalty by way of repentance. This week, Amnesty International somehow found out that she was actually 13 years old, a rape victim who had gone to the militia with her father to report the rape and was instead charged with adultery, and actually resisted the execution, as one might expect.

There is a letter from one Andy Smith in Kingston, Surrey, complaining:

I have not seen any reports of Islamic authorities condemning those involved in this medieval piece of butchery. Why not? We cannot tolerate any religious belief, culture or mindset that thinks this was in any way acceptable or understandable behaviour.

Since when was it the duty of Muslim “authorities” to answer for each and every public act of any Muslims anywhere in the world? The responsibility lies with the leaders of the Shabaab, and whoever is supporting them (which might include the government of Eritrea, which is not led by Muslims), and them alone. There are a host of reasons why this incident, if the report is accurate, should not have happened.

First, the girl appeared not to have been married. The death penalty for adulterers, male or female, applies only to adulterers, i.e. people who are married (or have been married) who are convicted of having sex outside marriage, and not if they have been forced, i.e. raped. There is no reports of her having a husband, and the source for her age being 13 is given as her father; had she been married, which is possible (although she most probably was not), they would surely have sourced the story from her husband. If the husband had rejected her for being raped, AI would no doubt have mentioned it.

Second, if the only evidence the militia had for her supposed adultery was complaining of being raped, that simply does not count. Such evidence (see this fatwa) includes a confession or testimony from four adult, male witnesses that they saw penetration (and not merely the man on top of a woman and that they looked like they were having sex). Even in the Maliki school, which puts the burden of proof on the woman to explain an out-of-wedlock pregnancy, coming forward after a rape to report it is a valid explanation.

So why would the militia execute a young girl based on such flimsy “evidence”? Perhaps they were under the misapprehension that Islamic law does not recognise rape when the law-books and hadeeth collections clearly indicate that it does. Perhaps they assumed that, because she did not show obvious sign of injury, she was lying (and assumed that she was only lying about the intercourse being rape, not about it happening at all). Who knows? The report from AI leaves us all guessing about these details.

The problem is that AI have circulated dubious horror stories about such matters before. In one edition of their British members’ magazine in the early 1990s, they printed an extract from Jean Sasson’s book Princess, in which a 13-year-old girl, also unmarried, who had been raped by three of her brother’s drug-intoxicated friends, was executed (after giving birth to the child conceived during the rape) because her father, who had supposedly never been comfortable with daughters, requested it. Whether this incident happened or not, and any Muslim or anyone familiar with Arab or Muslim culture would suspect otherwise, it appeared in Princess before the assassination of King Faisal, in the early 1970s, something AI neglected to mention when printing the extract.

AI may not be deliberately lying, but I suspect that they are receptive to such horror stories and may be passing them on without doing much in the way of checking, and since Kismayo is a difficult and dangerous place to get to, verifying the stories is difficult. We should be clear that if this incident is as reported, however, then it is a senseless murder of an innocent young girl by ignorant thugs, and should be condemned unreservedly.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Possibly Related Posts:


FacebookTwitterIdenti.caDeliciousDiggStumbleUponWordPressShare
Muslim worldPermalink
  • Ali Abdullah

    The biggest problem is that Somalia is a zone of anarchy with no law of any sort!

  • ummzeno

    I listened to the report on the Radio 4 news and it described how the girl protested that she didn’t accept this punishment, and how she was buried up to her neck and stoned. It also mentioned that some people among the crowd were saying “this is not shariah”. Assuming that the report is accurate and the girl was 13 and unmarried, I do feel there is a responsibility on the ulema to make it clear to the Somalis (the perpetrators and those who witnessed or heard about it) that this is completely wrong and unjust according to Islam. How else can ignorance be defeated? As an aside, can you tell me where you found the mention of rape in the law books and hadeeth collections? I haven’t come across it myself and would be grateful for a pointer.

  • Abu Umar

    If this is indeed the case then it should be condemned. At the same time, we should seek verification, as many of these Western organizations have agendas of their own.

  • Thersites

    It is adultery if one of the partners in a sexual act is married. Even if she was twenty three years old, married and adulterous, many people would think killing the girl or woman- let alone torturing her to death by stoning- vile and contemptible. Similat sentences for similar “crimes” were imposed by sharia courts in Nigeria and Pakistan. There the state intervened to prevent the sentences being carried out. In Somalia there is no effective state to intervene.

  • ummzeno

    I think it depends on the status of the individual rather than the status of the person they commit the act with. So if an unmarried person has intercourse with a married person then they could receive different penalties.

  • http://abunooralirlandee.wordpress.com Abu Noor Al-Irlandee

    Jazzak Allaahu Khayr for this post Yusuf.

    I agree that it is difficult to figure out how to comment on such a report. The report by AI is extremely horrifying, yet it is hard without additional information to understand at all what really happened. Certainly, it makes one feel extremely helpless at the realization that despite all the ways in which technology and communication have made the world smaller, there are still many situations in which it is extremely difficult to get enough information to even think in an intelligent way, let alone comment on, what goes on in different parts of our ummah.

    Allaahul-Musta’an.

  • http://www.happymuslimah.com Umm Salihah

    Assalam-alaikam, Aside from the problems of getting facts straight and reliable or verifiable sources, I cannot understand how any version of shariah or any interpretaion of any brand of Islam can lead to such punishment. The heart of a muslim is not supposed to be hardened. What does this say about the deen or humanity of a person/people who could do such a thing.

    Whatever the victims age, as other sisters have pointed out in numerous blogs, the Muslim world unfortunately has a real problem in the way it deals with rape.

  • Old Pickler

    Since when was it the duty of Muslim “authorities” to answer for each and every public act of any Muslims anywhere in the world?

    It isn’t their duty to condemn this murderous act, but it would be the right thing to do. And if it isn’t Islamic, all the more reason to speak out so that there are no more “misunderstandings”.

  • Robin Sparks

    Please don’t forget that an 8-yr-old boy who witnessed the stoning of the 13-yr-old rape victim was also shot to death by the militia because he attempted to intervene on the girl’s behalf. For some reason, I only saw his part in this sad story reported in “The Week”. Bottom line: You have to wonder just who this country cares about…