Why Starbucks is going down, credit crunch or no credit crunch

In the Evening Standard yesterday, we were told that tens of thousands of jobs were likely to be lost in the UK in the very near future, the biggest single number of which were in retail. What with Woolworths on the rocks (the place having had no niche of its own for years, everyone else being better at them in clothes, stationery, sweets, records, pretty much everything in fact) and a number of other retail chains having gone into liquidation recently (notably the Dolcis shoe shop chain). Apparently, chains of cafés selling expensive fancy coffee are apparently in the front line as well. We have heard that Starbucks have closed 600 stores in the USA and have pulled out of Australia altogether. I suspect, however, that Starbucks may be on the way down anyway, for two reasons.

The first is simply that it mushroomed a few years ago, and is now in the process of getting rid of some of its deadheads. A typical example is here in Kingston, where they opened their first café on the one-way system opposite Wilkinson’s around 2000. They later opened up three others, one in the Borders shop in the marketplace, one in the entrance to the Bentalls shopping mall, the other round the corner from the original, but in a much better location, being easily visible to people approaching the town from the railway station and Eden Street, which is full of bus stops. Nobody would go all the way round to the “race track” when they can go to that last one, so it had to go.

The second, however, is that their coffee is rubbish. For all they boast about their special blends of Ethiopian and South American coffee, they might as well not use coffee beans at all and make do with coffee colour, and provide you with a cup of hot milk to which you can add sugar and spices to taste, because the last few times I have had their coffee (I always have latte), that’s what it has tasted like. It hardly even smells like coffee. No, that’s not because it’s latte, because most other coffee vendors do caffe latte which tastes and smells like coffee. It’s because Starbucks is using poor quality beans, or beans which have sat around for hours and lost their flavour, or some other reason. They are not the only vendor which has been selling tasteless coffee - the Puccino’s “Deli Bar” in New Malden has sold me two tasteless lattes recently, both for £2.15 (Starbucks is £2.05) - but the taste of Starbucks’ coffee is because of something they, or their suppliers, are doing wrong.

To be fair, the reasons why coffee from these big chains is expensive has a lot to do with high-street rents - they can’t have much to do with paying high wages or using high-class coffee beans after all. Milk may have gone up lately, but a pint of milk only costs around 50p. When people have less money to spend and rents start going down, the price of a coffee might go down soon as well. However, recession or no recession, £2 or more is too much to pay for sweet, warm milk, which is something we can all make for ourselves at home.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Possibly Related Posts:


FacebookTwitterIdenti.caDeliciousDiggStumbleUponWordPressShare
NewsPermalink
  • http://imuslim.wordpress.com iMuslim

    According to my coffee connoisseur friend, Starbucks rebrews spent beans, hence the weakness.

  • Junaid

    Salams,

    Is there any truth to the accusations that Starbucks’ profits go towards supporting the Israeli army? Or are these mere Muslim urban legends with no basis in fact?

  • Haroon

    In 1998 Howard Schultz was honored by the Jerusalem Fund of Aish HaTorah with “The Israel 50th Anniversary Friend of Zion Tribute Award” for his great support to the Jewish state by “playing a key role in promoting close alliance between the United States and Israel”.

    The Jerusalem Fund of Aish HaTorah is known for funding Israeli arms fairs chaired by the Israeli transportation Minister and former Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz.

    Schultz had also been praised by the Israeli Foreign Ministry as being key to Israel’s long-term PR success.

    While the Israeli army was committing war crimes against Palestinians in Jenin, Nablus and Bethlehem, Schultz, explicitly accused the Palestinians of “supporting terrorism” and claimed that their Intifada, or uprising, was a manifestation of anti-Semitism. Nuff said

  • Old Pickler

    their coffee is rubbish

    I’ll drink to that. And overpriced.

    I have an affection for Woollies, though. It’s badly laid out and very old-fashioned, but you can get all kinds of useful things there. Cheap extension leads, adaptor plugs, white spirit, superglue, picnic stationery, bog standard CDs, DVDs and phones, cheap toys, garden furniture, kitchen stuff and Easter eggs. Can’t be all bad.

  • M Risbrook

    You just pay for the name at Starbucks. It’s a fashion drink. Most train station coffee tastes just as good as Starbucks and usually costs less.

  • http://oyhabibti.wordpress.com fairuza

    Starbucks coffee is crap. If I buy coffee from a coffeehouse it is from my local, fair trade one. Besides, their coffee tasting better, their customers are much less snooty.

  • Indigo Jo

    As-Salaamu ‘alaikum,

    Actually, I quite like getting coffee from Planet Organic or from the Whole Foods in London (although the service at the latter is dire since they moved the coffee machine to behind the checkouts). I’ve never noticed that Starbucks customers are snooty, but then, when I go to a Starbucks at all it’s usually one in Borders, and only then because I want to read a magazine or book. Whatever the qualities of the staff or customers, however, pretty much everyone who does espresso does it better than Starbucks, and not always more expensively.

  • tc

    Starbucks coffee is dire for a number of reasons.

    They overroast / char their beans. (Just try the carbonated espresso)

    The rest of their drinks are a watery soup, which is why the latte tastes rather like a bedtime drink.

    To be fair I think they did do a pretty good job of generally improving the standard of coffee on the high street in the late 90’s. And of course, whether you like it or not,the coffee served is generally consistent, unlike some other chains manned by trainee baristas who’ve never heard of a backflush.

  • M Risbrook

    I think there is some truth to Starbucks generally improving the standard of coffee served in Britain. In the days before Starbucks came on the scene it was uncommon to find coffee of a half decent quality unless you knew where to look.