At the time of the attacks some of the calls from the tattackers to their superiors were being intercepted. They dropped a ‘phone on the trawler they used to enter Mumbai which helped identify the networks concerned. You still haven’t given a source for your claim that the owner of CALLPHONEX is Palestinian and/or Jewish. As I pointed out, The Times of India claim he is “an American citizen of Asian origin.

“hillary clinton and tim roemer are ‘pimps’ for rough diamond mining lobby like maurice tempelsman………get it now ?”

What is your evidence for this claim, ‘taique’? You actually claimed “maybe dan reed did not go into the careful deatails or the FBI got it dubbed in a hurry just before the arrival of hillary clinton and tim roemer ” in connexion with Reed’s T.V. programme. You still haven’t said why the F.B.I. should want to interfere with that or what its relevannce to Clinton’s visit is.

“why should the rough diamond links of taj ,oberoi and nariman house not get mentioned ?” Their connexions with diamond dealers and the diamond trade have been mentioned several times. However, there is no reason to think that the attackers were concerned about this, so is is irrelevant to the trial.

In short, ‘tarique’, you are a ‘buffoon’, a ‘hypocrite’, a buffoon, a hypocrite and a paranoiac headcase.

“the FBI said he was holidaying in canada when he deposed via videoconferencing” …so he was not “surrounded by FBI agents” as you claimed.

“why is the FBI calling the shots in the investigation ?” What makes you think the F.B.I. is calling the shots? They seem to be providing information asked for by the court, a rather different matter.

I haven’t seen the documentary- Channel 4 has no connexion with the B.B.C., by the way- if documentary rather than a dramadoc- as they are called- it is. You seem to think that Europeans are able to- or intersted in- distinguishing various Indian accents. If- as you claim- the video was illegally passed on to him then it may well have needed dubbing. Why should the F.B.I. have dubbed it? What does it have to do with Hilary Clinton’s visit to India? What is your evodence for any of the claims you make?

“and why are u saying that kasab trial is based on CST , only because the media and police did a ‘cover up ’ on the DTC conference at taj and never mentioned the diamond exhibition in oberoi trident or alrosa diamond company links to nariman house ?” You re\lly ought to read sentences to the end: I told you why Kasab’s trial is concerned with events at C.S.T. for a very simple reason. That’s where Kasab was. As there is no evidence that the killers were aware of or concerned about “the DTC conference at taj and never mentioned the diamond exhibition in oberoi trident or alrosa diamond company links to nariman house”, there’s no need to ention them in the trial.