<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The importance of sensitivity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2009/02/07/the_importance_of_sensitivity/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2009/02/07/the_importance_of_sensitivity</link>
	<description>Politics, tech and media issues from a Muslim perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indigo Jo Blogs &#8212; How to get women into tech</title>
		<link>http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2009/02/07/the_importance_of_sensitivity#comment-37002</link>
		<dc:creator>Indigo Jo Blogs &#8212; How to get women into tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 20:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogistan.co.uk/ijwp/mt.php/2009/02/07/the_importance_of_sensitivity#comment-37002</guid>
		<description>[...] recently, I commented on an article (written by a woman!) in Linux Format, in which she castigated women who took offence to sexist [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] recently, I commented on an article (written by a woman!) in Linux Format, in which she castigated women who took offence to sexist [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akela</title>
		<link>http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2009/02/07/the_importance_of_sensitivity#comment-9105</link>
		<dc:creator>Akela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 13:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogistan.co.uk/ijwp/mt.php/2009/02/07/the_importance_of_sensitivity#comment-9105</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t remember when I was first told it but one of the best bits of advice I was given was the old cliche of if you feel the need to check was in the room before you say something then don&#039;t say it.  The trouble is that from what I have seen in the press (and hence must be treated with a decent pinch of salt) Thatcher didn&#039;t see the need to check who was in the room and more importantly even now still wouldn&#039;t.  Ross and Clarkson were both being deliberatly provocative and stepped over the line that they normally manage to tread with some skill.  Thatcher&#039;s attitude though suggests that she doesn&#039;t seem to know where the line is and that makes her a potentially massive liability for the BBC.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t remember when I was first told it but one of the best bits of advice I was given was the old cliche of if you feel the need to check was in the room before you say something then don&#8217;t say it.  The trouble is that from what I have seen in the press (and hence must be treated with a decent pinch of salt) Thatcher didn&#8217;t see the need to check who was in the room and more importantly even now still wouldn&#8217;t.  Ross and Clarkson were both being deliberatly provocative and stepped over the line that they normally manage to tread with some skill.  Thatcher&#8217;s attitude though suggests that she doesn&#8217;t seem to know where the line is and that makes her a potentially massive liability for the BBC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Carty</title>
		<link>http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2009/02/07/the_importance_of_sensitivity#comment-9104</link>
		<dc:creator>George Carty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 08:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogistan.co.uk/ijwp/mt.php/2009/02/07/the_importance_of_sensitivity#comment-9104</guid>
		<description>Surely the big problem with multiculturalism is not cultural diversity itself, but all those people who have made lucrative careers on the back of it?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely the big problem with multiculturalism is not cultural diversity itself, but all those people who have made lucrative careers on the back of it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old Pickler</title>
		<link>http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2009/02/07/the_importance_of_sensitivity#comment-9103</link>
		<dc:creator>Old Pickler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 22:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogistan.co.uk/ijwp/mt.php/2009/02/07/the_importance_of_sensitivity#comment-9103</guid>
		<description>Actually, the word golliwog has probably been used more in the last few days than in the last ten years.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the word golliwog has probably been used more in the last few days than in the last ten years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thersites</title>
		<link>http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2009/02/07/the_importance_of_sensitivity#comment-9102</link>
		<dc:creator>Thersites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 19:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogistan.co.uk/ijwp/mt.php/2009/02/07/the_importance_of_sensitivity#comment-9102</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s interesting to contrast the fate of Jeremy Clarkson after he was offensive in public. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/feb/06/jeremy-clarkson-gordon-brown-insult&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/feb/06/jeremy-clarkson-gordon-brown-insult&lt;/a&gt;
Did Clarkson get away with it because he made a- limited- apology, because the B.B.C. think it less offensive to mock disability than race, because he is more valuable to the B.B.C. than Thatcher, because tennis players are more sensitive than politicians or because not dismissing buffoons who insult British prime ministers shows that the B.B.C. is politically independent?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting to contrast the fate of Jeremy Clarkson after he was offensive in public. <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/feb/06/jeremy-clarkson-gordon-brown-insult">http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/feb/06/jeremy-clarkson-gordon-brown-insult</a>
Did Clarkson get away with it because he made a- limited- apology, because the B.B.C. think it less offensive to mock disability than race, because he is more valuable to the B.B.C. than Thatcher, because tennis players are more sensitive than politicians or because not dismissing buffoons who insult British prime ministers shows that the B.B.C. is politically independent?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indigo Jo</title>
		<link>http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2009/02/07/the_importance_of_sensitivity#comment-9101</link>
		<dc:creator>Indigo Jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 15:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogistan.co.uk/ijwp/mt.php/2009/02/07/the_importance_of_sensitivity#comment-9101</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say that racism is more a symptom of mental inadequacy, not mental illness.  These people are usually perfectly sane, just prejudiced.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say that racism is more a symptom of mental inadequacy, not mental illness.  These people are usually perfectly sane, just prejudiced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whatever</title>
		<link>http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2009/02/07/the_importance_of_sensitivity#comment-9100</link>
		<dc:creator>Whatever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 14:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogistan.co.uk/ijwp/mt.php/2009/02/07/the_importance_of_sensitivity#comment-9100</guid>
		<description>Good Article.

Multi-culturalism, Political Correctness, Freedom of Speech...all of these buzz words are now being attacked by the yester-generation to defend their &quot;right&quot; to speak their minds.  Their unwillingness to accept that we live in a diverse society is one of the problems that Britain has not been able to shake off.  People grew up in Nazi Germany thinking that Jews were bad, but that doesn&#039;t give them a right to call Jews nasty names - the majority of them accept this even if they are hesitant to the idea.  The reason is that there is a law against anti-semitism.  But it is not just the law that stops them from speaking their mind about their hatred for Jews (a childhood hatred that most of them grew up with).  It is also due to a momentum that the global media has put to anti-semitism as being &quot;wrong&quot;.  And rightly so.

Come to the arena of Black and White, and you have some southern European nations that still use the word Negro - to describe Black people.  They say that in their latin based language it simply means black.  Whilst the logic is plain, the context of the word deliberately escapes them and their childhood usages.  Here in the UK one would be hard-pressed to find someone using the word &quot;Negro&quot;.  And rightly so.

&quot;Golliwog&quot; - the die hard yester-generation want to use this word because they grew up with fond memories of their childhood and their colonial attitudes about black people.  They feel that yet another beloved term of their mythical superiority is being stripped from them.  I am sure the BNP will defend them on this one.

I do feel sorry for some of these people though.  It is not easy to throw away something you have grown up with and used unchecked and even seen promoted as a national treasure.  What is rather more worrisome is the fact that some politicians and press are actually defending Thatcher - maybe they think her first name is Maggie - and of course Maggie represents yet another icon of their comfort zones.

As for the Beeb...their hypocrisy is characterized by all their other paranoid scizophrenic behaviour.  Maybe they want to make friends with the people who labelled them &#039;biased&#039; in the Charity Appeal scenario.  Maybe they just dont know what to do.

We should have the likes of Trevor Philips to advise us how he feels about this and all the other afro-carribean Brits out there.  That would give some validity to the right or wrong of the use of the term Golliwog.

As for privacy and the use of this or any other derogatory word or thought, we should all be decent enough to know what is right and what is wrong.

Whatever
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Article.</p>

<p>Multi-culturalism, Political Correctness, Freedom of Speech&#8230;all of these buzz words are now being attacked by the yester-generation to defend their &#8220;right&#8221; to speak their minds.  Their unwillingness to accept that we live in a diverse society is one of the problems that Britain has not been able to shake off.  People grew up in Nazi Germany thinking that Jews were bad, but that doesn&#8217;t give them a right to call Jews nasty names - the majority of them accept this even if they are hesitant to the idea.  The reason is that there is a law against anti-semitism.  But it is not just the law that stops them from speaking their mind about their hatred for Jews (a childhood hatred that most of them grew up with).  It is also due to a momentum that the global media has put to anti-semitism as being &#8220;wrong&#8221;.  And rightly so.</p>

<p>Come to the arena of Black and White, and you have some southern European nations that still use the word Negro - to describe Black people.  They say that in their latin based language it simply means black.  Whilst the logic is plain, the context of the word deliberately escapes them and their childhood usages.  Here in the UK one would be hard-pressed to find someone using the word &#8220;Negro&#8221;.  And rightly so.</p>

<p>&#8220;Golliwog&#8221; - the die hard yester-generation want to use this word because they grew up with fond memories of their childhood and their colonial attitudes about black people.  They feel that yet another beloved term of their mythical superiority is being stripped from them.  I am sure the BNP will defend them on this one.</p>

<p>I do feel sorry for some of these people though.  It is not easy to throw away something you have grown up with and used unchecked and even seen promoted as a national treasure.  What is rather more worrisome is the fact that some politicians and press are actually defending Thatcher - maybe they think her first name is Maggie - and of course Maggie represents yet another icon of their comfort zones.</p>

<p>As for the Beeb&#8230;their hypocrisy is characterized by all their other paranoid scizophrenic behaviour.  Maybe they want to make friends with the people who labelled them &#8216;biased&#8217; in the Charity Appeal scenario.  Maybe they just dont know what to do.</p>

<p>We should have the likes of Trevor Philips to advise us how he feels about this and all the other afro-carribean Brits out there.  That would give some validity to the right or wrong of the use of the term Golliwog.</p>

<p>As for privacy and the use of this or any other derogatory word or thought, we should all be decent enough to know what is right and what is wrong.</p>

<p>Whatever</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeedsLad</title>
		<link>http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2009/02/07/the_importance_of_sensitivity#comment-9099</link>
		<dc:creator>LeedsLad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 12:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogistan.co.uk/ijwp/mt.php/2009/02/07/the_importance_of_sensitivity#comment-9099</guid>
		<description>I have always thought &quot;racism&quot; was due to undiagnosed mental illlness esp people susceptible to dementia which I understand her poor mother is now suffering.

The lady was definitely aware of it, but let it slip because of her illness. You will hear more and more gaffes as she is boisterous unlike her disciplined mother.

Racism is just the result of one&#039;s need to &quot;order&quot; matters just like it is around their home and surrounding. If James leaves a house with kids named Daniel and Harry, James is 100% assured to have workers and friends who are also called Daniel and Harry. It is just mechanisms of survival which they employ to reduce the destructive tendencies of their illness which catches up them by the way.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always thought &#8220;racism&#8221; was due to undiagnosed mental illlness esp people susceptible to dementia which I understand her poor mother is now suffering.</p>

<p>The lady was definitely aware of it, but let it slip because of her illness. You will hear more and more gaffes as she is boisterous unlike her disciplined mother.</p>

<p>Racism is just the result of one&#8217;s need to &#8220;order&#8221; matters just like it is around their home and surrounding. If James leaves a house with kids named Daniel and Harry, James is 100% assured to have workers and friends who are also called Daniel and Harry. It is just mechanisms of survival which they employ to reduce the destructive tendencies of their illness which catches up them by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thersites</title>
		<link>http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2009/02/07/the_importance_of_sensitivity#comment-9098</link>
		<dc:creator>Thersites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 02:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogistan.co.uk/ijwp/mt.php/2009/02/07/the_importance_of_sensitivity#comment-9098</guid>
		<description>&quot;The remark was made off-air&quot;.
Then the people with her should have made it plain they thought what she said was offensive and left it at that. As some of the other people on the show were specialists in &quot;edgy&quot; and offensive humour they were also obliged to explain why Thatcher&#039;s remarks were somehow more offensively offensive than some of their own had been.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The remark was made off-air&#8221;.
Then the people with her should have made it plain they thought what she said was offensive and left it at that. As some of the other people on the show were specialists in &#8220;edgy&#8221; and offensive humour they were also obliged to explain why Thatcher&#8217;s remarks were somehow more offensively offensive than some of their own had been.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

