I’ve never cared much for the MuhajiGoons, but seeing this display of “patriotism” by a wannabe lynch mob of Britain’s “finest” made me a bit more sympathetic. They did not seem to be saying anything, just holding up their banners, while the mob (albeit a fairly small one, which made me wonder who organised it) seemed to be baying for blood and required the police to restrain them. Also, someone has something to say about the Muslim protestors’ mothers (about 6:05). Charming.
Possibly Related Posts:
- Attempt to link Islamic societies to terrorism
- Opposition to the war wasn’t just about anti-Americanism
- Andy versus Maajid
- Muslims versus Anjum Choudhary
- Anwar al-Awlaki: trauma and extremism
I wonder why Muslims don’t protest the Muslim soldiers part of the Iraqi government or protest against the Shias killing the Sunnis or the Sunnis killing the Shia like they protest against the Western military.
I can’t stand MuhajiGoons, but I support their right to peaceful protest. This is disgraceful.
“the mob (albeit a fairly small one, which made me wonder who organised it) seemed to be baying for blood and required the police to restrain them. ” The fact that the counter-demonstration was “fairly small”, had no banners and built up over time suggests that it wasn’t organised.
Something went wrong with my last post. It should read:
“the mob (albeit a fairly small one, which made me wonder who organised it) seemed to be baying for blood and required the police to restrain them. ” The fact that the counter-demonstration was “fairly small”, had no banners and built up over time suggests that it wasn’t organised. Given the attention given to the Mujies in Luton lately, all it would take would be someone with a mobile phone to get a flash-mob together pretty quickly.
No sympathy. Those Muslims should leave this country, in which they do not belong.
I’m glad the counter-protesters mocked them about their benefits, which they seem more than happy to claim from the evil kafir.
I wonder how they get all the benefits they’re alleged to be getting, because I’ve been out of a job since the autumn and they’re only offering me the usual £60 jobseekers’ allowance. Do you just have to stand around and shout and hold stupid press conferences, or do you have to be in the pay of someone’s intelligence services? (I wonder if Anjum gets paid for his interviews, whether officially or out of the presenters’ expenses.)
Salaam Alaikum,
Simple. Claim sick benefit due to depression. Not only does that increase your weekly allowance, you also get other benefits and discounts. Claim to have several children with special needs. That’s more money.
I am in no way claiming that being on benefits is an easy life, but there are certainly some individuals who know how to play the system.
You’d have to produce evidence for both depression and the children, though. If I.J. has savings above a certain amount he will not receive further benefit until he has used them down to that amount to support himself. After that the job-seeker’s allowance will be in addition to rent or mortgage support and help with council tax and other benefits. Still not luxurious, I agree, but not quite as bad as the bald figures make it seem. Either save so much you’ll never need to depend on the state or don’t bother. If a claimant were registered as disabled- which they probably would be with depression or other long-term illnesses- they would probably receive a Freedom Pass, giving free travel in London and on local buses anywhere in the U.K. or its local equivalent, or help with getting a car and privileges in using it. Someone offered to pay me to register their car as mine so they could use those benefits. I dislike motorists and motor cars and turned it down so I don’t know how easy that particular fiddle would be to operate but people certainly think it is a feasible scheme. I help with an organisation for benefit claimants and people with depression are among the ones who suffer most from nit claiming their entitlements- a common symptom of depression is a sort of psychological inertia which makes them less likely to receive the benefits they should. People who lose benefits temporarily don’t bother to make a fuss and so lose them for good or don’t claim them at all.
As’salamu Aleikum,
Was it necessary to use the term “trash”?
Simple. Claim sick benefit due to depression. Not only does that increase your weekly allowance, you also get other benefits and discounts. Claim to have several children with special needs. That’s more money.
A bit rich coming from somebody who believed that parents should engage in paid employment rather than home educate their children whilst claiming benefits. At least the home educating parents on income support actually save the taxpayer money!
Take down the white trash label. I know you wouldn’t have the guts to use a term like brown trash or black trash. The title is offensive.
Salaam Alaikum,
I am in no way condoning such behaviour, just pointing out the tactics some people use to increase their benefits.
I think the term “white trash” is mild, Frank. Its funny watching similar minded trash troll this blog with the usual nonsense. Take pRickler for instance. The hypocrisy of this degenerate BNP troll is laughable. Where would you deport British citizens to? In fact why should they be deported? For protesting? So much for freedumb of speech.. As idiotic as Muhajigoons are, the trash they faced are worse. They can’t have it both ways.
Old Pickler, should British communists during the Cold War have been deported to the Soviet Union?
@DrM
I am not the type to be offended by racial slurs. I just wish there wouldn’t be a problem if everyone was allowed to use them.
You and I both know the author of this blog would not use the term brown or black trash, because it is unPC.
I am not from the UK, but I know enough about the country to know there is no “free speech” there as you put it. The UK hasn’t allowed certain people with less than PC views to speak in the country, the Wilders guy for example.
I am not one for selected morality, you either support something or you don’t. People who support speech only when they agree with it are hypocrites and cowards.
Actually, the reason people don’t use “black/brown trash” is because those terms imply that someone is trash because they’re black or brown, as with “black bastard”, while “white trash”, commonly used by both whites and blacks in some places, doesn’t.
Actually, the reason people don’t use “black/brown trash” is because those terms imply that someone is trash because they’re black or brown, as with “black bastard”, while “white trash”, commonly used by both whites and blacks in some places, doesn’t.
What does calling someone white trash mean then? It is common knowledge there are one set of rules for whites and another for non whites when it comes to racial discussion in the world. It is “kosher” to attack white people, while it not cool to attack non whites.
The people who throw around the term white trash would NEVER use the slur brown or black trash. Society doesn’t accept it.
I understand you being a Muslim you have to sympathize with all anti whitey causes, to keep your credibility, it still distasteful what you said though. And it was also racist.
@Frank,
In the US, the term “white trash” was invented by Northerners against Southerners aka rednecks. It is generally used against uncultured, uneducated, ignorant whites like the fools who get their schooling from the Daily Mail. As for “brown trash” I believe you guys in the UK already have a term like that called “paki.”
In an age where the scientists trying to safe lives from being wrecked by earthquakes cannot get their funding, but topless models such as “Jordan” can do so in a matter of hours. Then I guess we are all “trashy”.
Old Pickler, should British communists during the Cold War have been deported to the Soviet Union?
They should have been punished as traitors. In the case of the Al Muj bunch, just cut their benefits off. Since they are incapable of living except by leeching off the kafir, they will be forced to go elsewhere and good riddance.
@Frank,
In the US, the term “white trash” was invented by Northerners against Southerners aka rednecks. It is generally used against uncultured, uneducated, ignorant whites like the fools who get their schooling from the Daily Mail. As for “brown trash” I believe you guys in the UK already have a term like that called “paki.”
I’m not in the UK, I’m in the US too. I think it is against the law to call a person brown or black trash in the UK, they are a protected people just like the Jews. We have the same type of atmosphere in the US, we might have free speech on paper. But if you called someone black trash, brown trash, or Jewish trash you would most likely be committing career suicide. The prince Harry guy was vilified in the UK a few months ago for calling someone a Paki.
@Frank:
Whether it would be “career suicide” would depend on how valuable you are, or whether they can’t get rid of you anyway (e.g. Prince Harry, who won’t stop being a prince just because he wears a Nazi uniform to a fancy dress party - assuming he was born on the right side of the blanket, that is). As we all know, Jade Goody came back from the “dead” after the Shilpa Shetty affair and Carol Thatcher already had other programmes made at the time of the “golliwog Frog” incident a few months back.
You could get arrested for racial abuse in the UK, and if a bunch of black or Asian men beat up a white man and call him “white trash”, it would be classed as a racially aggravated assault.
Political correctness decides what is and isn’t acceptable. I remember when White Men Can’t Jump came out and questioned whether it was racist. Replace White with Black and there would be outrage