I’ve not long finished watching a BBC Storyville documentary (see it on iPlayer here) on the scientist D. Carleton Gajdusek (pronounced Guy-du-shek), who won a Nobel prize for work on prion diseases (such as the notorious mad cow disease) who was later convicted of molesting young boys. Gajdusek imported dozens of boys from various Pacific islands and became a “father figure” to many of them; one of them later accused him of molesting him.

The charges were not of rape or other more serious forms of sexual abuse, but they still involved inappropriate sexual contact which was not entirely consensual. He pled guilty and got a 19-month jail term, but was supported by a fair proportion of the world’s scientific community, some of whom were shown on this programme trying to minimise his actions. Interviewed about them himself, he claimed that the boys he slept with jumped into his bed and if they wanted to touch his private parts (he didn’t use that expression), he was not going to stop them. He also fed the line that boys of a certain age basically enjoy being fondled by other males, a defence favoured by paedophiles the world over. He had no idea, and refused to accept, that he had hurt anyone, although some of the boys interviewed by the programme-makers said that he had.

I am rather surprised that he was not robustly challenged over this. I have fairly strong memories of late childhood and early adolescence and I do remember never having any physical attraction to other boys. What I do remember is the fondlings and improper suggestions I got from various older boys at school, and that it made me feel very uncomfortable and intimidated. I’m not saying that boys never indulge in play with each other (although many emphatically don’t), but it does not give older men the right to take advantage. I’m not sure if men who offer the “boys will be boys” defence really believe it themselves or just use it as an excuse, but they must be challenged as it’s simply not true.

Possibly Related Posts:


3 Comments to “They love it, honest”

  1. Ikram Hadi says:

    Your first sentence is unclear on whether the cows molested young boys or the scientist.

    I know about the intimidated feeling you are talking about.

  2. Thersites says:

    “Your first sentence is unclear on whether the cows molested young boys or the scientist.”

    Your first sentence is unclear on whether the cows molested the scientist or the cows molested the young boys.

    Gajdusek’s behaviour was disgraceful, but the victims weren’t actually young boys but adolescents- young men in the cultures they came from, where what they and Gajdusek did was pefectly acceptable. The problem was Gajdusek’s use of his position of power and respect for his own gratification and that would still have been true regardless of the legality of his behaviour.

  3. LeedsLad says:

    Now these guys have gone to Africa since the Asian countries are now well aware of them.

    This doctor got away because he had value more than his victims. It is something you only realise late, but as long as you are a coodity of high vale; you will get away with murder. Otherwise, who will pay the ££ of judges lawers, politicians etc.

    People like these are best dealt with mob rule style.

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>