Last week, a South African female runner who won the gold medal by a very clear margin (albeit because of a surge in the last minute or so) in the World Athletics Championships in Berlin had her gender questioned, as she has a rather deep voice and a masculine appearance, despite by all accounts having been raised as a girl and always identified as female. The suggestion is not that she cheated, but that she has some sort of genetic abnormality or hormonal imbalance which might give her a competitive advantage over other (typical) female athletes. This has led to a whole lot of clueless commentary by writers who don’t know what they’re talking about, and also a pointless accusation of racism.

I got the title for this post from a friend’s remark on Facebook: “if it looks like a bloke, if it talks like a bloke and if it runs like a bloke - it probably is a bloke!”. However, women’s voices sounding a bit like men’s, with or without any gender abnormality, is rare but it exists. I remember hearing Maya Angelou on Radio 4 (on Book Club, if I remember rightly) and noticing how masculine her voice sounded; I remember a phonecall from my sister’s female boss many years ago, and when she said who she was, I didn’t believe it because it sounded like a male voice. I even said to my sister, “this is some bloke saying he’s your boss!”, and the woman said, “oh, people always think I’m a fella on the phone” and at that point I knew she was who (and what) she said she was.

Of the many gender abnormalities or “intersex” conditions which may be at play here, the two best-known are androgen insensitivity syndrome and congenital adrenal hyperplasia. AIS is when a body is resistant to testosterone, and even if a baby has XY (i.e. male) chromosomes, the testosterone has no effect. Testosterone has a role in forming the male body in the womb as well as in developing the boy’s body into an adult male one, as well as in retaining energy and a man-like bearing later on. A “male” person with AIS ends up with a superficially feminine body, albeit usually without a womb (and therefore infertile), and will often look very feminine because the oestrogen they do produce can work without the influence of testosterone. There are complete and partial versions of AIS, with those affected with the latter becoming more likely to have ambiguous genitalia and slightly more masculine features.

CAH is a defect of the adrenal glands which sometimes produces masculinisation of a female body, and sometimes a girl with this condition will be raised as a boy until the mistake is realised later (this is less common than it used to be as identifying a baby’s real sex at birth when there is ambiguity is much easier now; the case of Lady Colin Campbell may be one of CAH and you may find a similar story here). If this is the case here, it may give her a competitive advantage as girls with CAH may be more masculine, more physical and more aggressive than other women. Unlike other women with intersex conditions, their reproductive organs are unmistakeably female and they usually have periods.

The tone of some of the coverage has suggested that there is much tittilation about this episode: Mark Lawson, in an otherwise well-informed opinion piece in last Friday’s Guardian, opined that “without being too indelicate about this, lycra running shorts and slow-mo HD television pictures show that if Semenya is a man, she is clearly no Linford Christie”. Other articles have suggested that women with intersex conditions have male and female reproductive organs, which they don’t — they have genitals that resemble one sex and reproductive organs (often rudimentary) of the other, or none.

Then there was Germaine Greer in last Friday’s Guardian who, it should be pointed out, has “form” when it comes to ill-informed attitudes towards intersex conditions and particularly AIS: a number of individuals associated with the AIS Support Group have corresponded with her about a section in her book, The Whole Woman, reproduced here in which she asserts that women with AIS develop “a masculine figure — broad shoulders, narrow hips, no waist, short legs — and progressive baldness and heavy facial hair”, none of which actually develops in the case of complete AIS. Greer’s position is (or at least was) that a woman is someone with XX chromosomes and nothing else, even though those with complete or most forms of partial AIS are always identified as female at birth, are brought up as female, could never resemble anything other than a female in body appearance or voice because of their resistance to testosterone, and don’t realise that they are anything other than a normal woman until they try to have sex or to have children.

In last Friday’s Guardian, Greer makes one of her usual side-swipes at transsexuals and then acknowledges that chromosome-based gender tests for athletes didn’t pick up a single case of a male athlete disguising himself as a woman in years, but did pick up abnormalities in women who didn’t know they had them, in at least one case disqualifying a woman unfairly (presumably Santhi Soundarajan). However, she ends her piece by suggesting that “people who don’t ovulate or menstruate will probably always physically outperform people who do”, apparently ignorant of the fact that some female athletes simply stop menstruating. Additionally, some women with high-level spinal cord injuries take medication to stop their periods because they cause dysreflexia, a potentially fatal blood pressure disorder which many people with such injuries are prone to, so perhaps this could be considered an unfair advantage in the wheelchair races. Greer does not suggest that such people be disqualified, as she grudgingly admits that such competitive advantages, even in people who are “mentally female and physically male”, are just a fact of life.

Those who knew her in South Africa, as already stated, are in no doubt that Semenya is female. Many think the controversy absurd, with one woman in her village saying, “she played with my girl. I’ve got no doubts. She wears panties”. She played football in an otherwise all-male team, and her team-mates remember that she would change away from the men on the team. Nobody disputes that she was a tomboy, that she never wore skirts after a certain age, and that she failed to develop breasts, which does suggest that there are medical reasons behind her masculine appearance.

Still, I find the race row that some have tried to make of this to be somewhat convenient and ridiculous also. This has nothing to do with white people judging a black woman based on white standards of femininity; anyone who looks at Caster Semenya and then at any image of a black African woman, such as those accompanying the above BBC article, will easily see that, regardless of her identity and upbringing, she does not look anything like them. There may be a stereotype of black women, particularly Afro-American women, being somewhat masculine compared to “dainty” white women (the author of What Tami Said notes that questions about the femininity of black women are nothing new, although as Mark Lawson pointed out, such questions about powerful white women are not uncommon either), but they always acted and dressed like women and to anyone not blinded by prejudice, their femininity was obvious. These days, you find many white women in the UK, particularly of the older generation, who have short hair and a somewhat boyish dress sense (and I am talking straight women here) who never wear a dress except when it’s too hot for trousers or on special occasions, something which is rare in Africa.

But you won’t convince someone determined to grandstand about race that this isn’t about race. However, this issue could perhaps have been dealt with rather more sensitively in South Africa, where perhaps any medical condition she has could have been treated before she went to Berlin, where she has faced the humiliation of questions about her sex and seeing the most intimate details about her life become a topic for worldwide discussion.

Possibly Related Posts:


  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Identi.ca
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • WordPress
  • Share/Bookmark

Tags:

5 Comments to “If it looks like a bloke …”

  1. Alessandra says:

    “Those who knew her in South Africa, as already stated, are in no doubt that Semenya is female. Many think the controversy absurd, with one woman in her village saying, “she played with my girl. I’ve got no doubts. She wears panties”. She played football in an otherwise all-male team, and her team-mates remember that she would change away from the men on the team. Nobody disputes that she was a tomboy, that she never wore skirts after a certain age, and that she failed to develop breasts, which does suggest that there are medical reasons behind her masculine appearance.”

    The principal in her school said he thought she was a boy until she was 11. And aside from her family and a few people who knew her when she was young, I didn’t see any interviews with anyone from her current university, anyone who interacts with Semenya now. I find this more than odd, just another suspicious element in this case. In the only interview I saw of “her,” she gives me the impression to have matured into a him, not a her, in terms of identity and gender, not to mention all the male physical and voice aspects already extensively discussed in the media. This would explain why, when she was young, she was put with the girls and dressed as a girl and thought to be a girl. But as she matured, “she” began to develop towards a male psychology and identity.

    http://www.sbs.com.au/blogarticle/112372/Athletics‘-crying-game

    And I also have the impression she is no little clueless victim, no little “girl” who all of a sudden has been told she looks like a grown man. Semenya is not blind.

    I think by your article that you are not aware of the latest Semenya allegations about high testosterone levels and a doping-tainted head coach.

    Anyways, I enjoyed your post.

  2. sabiwabi says:

    Whatever the case may be, I feel for this poor girl. For heaven’s sake she’s only 18! I can’t imagine the humiliation she must be feeling.

  3. Anon says:

    @Alessandra

    I think by your article that you are not aware of the latest Semenya allegations about high testosterone levels

    What? I have extremely low levels of natural testosterone due to a fairly common chromosome disorder. That doesn’t make me female, although some XXY men do exhibit more female traits. In reality, about 1 in 1000 males have an extra X chromosome, so it’s quite widespread.

    I’m no expert on female chromosome disorders and other conditions, but my experience of XXY leads me to conclude that this individual could quite easily be female. When Santhi Soundarajan was stripped of her silver medal at the Asian Games in 2006 it was because she had “abnormal chromosomes” or “more Y chromosomes than allowed”, although the gynecologist and psychologist concluded she was female.

    What a shame our teachers told us that men have XY chromosomes and women XX chromosomes, and just left it at that. It makes life nice and simple for people with simple minds, but Allah made us diverse and granted all of us our tests.

  4. Alessandra says:

    Anon - for your info, the IAAF no longer solely checks chromosomes to determine the sex of an athlete. But what you mostly display not knowing anything about is how doping works and how it relates to hormonal levels.

    For a magnificent read on the subject:

    http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/full/43/7/1262

    “Hormonal doping and androgenization of athletes: a secret program of the German Democratic Republic government”

    Werner W. Franke1,a and Brigitte Berendonk2

    1 Division of Cell Biology/0110, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

    2 Hölderlin High School, Heidelberg, Germany. a Author for correspondence. Fax 49-6221-423404.

    Abstract

    Several classified documents saved after the collapse of the German Democratic Republic (GDR) in 1990 describe the promotion by the government of the use of drugs, notably androgenic steroids, in high-performance sports (doping). Top-secret doctoral theses, scientific reports, progress reports of grants, proceedings from symposia of experts, and reports of physicians and scientists who served as unofficial collaborators for the Ministry for State Security (“Stasi”) reveal that from 1966 on, hundreds of physicians and scientists, including top-ranking professors, performed doping research and administered prescription drugs as well as unapproved experimental drug preparations. Several thousand athletes were treated with androgens every year, including minors of each sex. Special emphasis was placed on administering androgens to women and adolescent girls because this practice proved to be particularly effective for sports performance. Damaging side effects were recorded, some of which required surgical or medical intervention. In addition, several prominent scientists and sports physicians of the GDR contributed to the development of methods of drug administration that would evade detection by international doping controls.

  5. Anon says:

    Allah knows best.

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Auto-link my latest post (CommentLuv)