Spectator forced to apologise to Islam Expo

Inayat Bunglawala drew our attention yesterday to an apology published in the Spectator, a British right-wing political magazine (a tedious rag where people flaunt whatever privilege and bigotry they might have). It reads:

Stephen Pollard and the Spectator apologise for the unintended and false suggestion in a blog published on 15 July 2008 that Islam Expo Limited is a fascist party dedicated to genocide which organised a conference with a racist and genocidal programme. We accept that Islam Expo’s purpose is to provide a neutral and broad-based platform for debate on issues relating to Muslims and Islam.

Stephen Pollard is editor of the Jewish Chronicle and the smears he wrote in an earlier edition were sourced from Harry’s Place.

To begin with, Islam Expo isn’t a party, it’s a business which puts on an annual event in a big conference venue in London where there are speeches, exhibitions and entertainment and stalls from Muslim charities and businesses (or just those which might interest Muslims). I’ve never been to it, but I have been to a similar event, Global Peace and Unity. There is nothing remotely fascist about any of it; there are speeches and the speakers come from almost the entire spectrum of Islamic thought, including various preachers, thinkers, writers, charity workers, politicians etc including from some outside the Muslim community.

There was a time when using the word nazi or fascist in response to anything you don’t like was held to be trivialising of what the real thing led to in the past. Fascism has certain characteristics, including personality cults promoted heavily by the state, an oppressive one-party form of politics and a heavy government hand in the economy. These things exist in parts of the Muslim world today, but just because Sayyid Qutb or early thinkers of the Muslim Brotherhood were influenced by European fascists, it doesn’t make the Muslim Brotherhood fascist to this day. Certainly, it doesn’t make any event in which people from any organisation connected to the Muslim Brotherhood participate fascist.

Possibly Related Posts:

  • M Risbrook

    a tedious rag

    Also applies to the Guardian.

  • Irony of Life

    I would reccomend an interesting story; I recently read it in the Guardian:


    It speaks about a female prisoner who has been condemned to execution for a case where sex was used and her husband was murdered.

    It is about a case in the US.

  • Irony of Life

    I am amazed at the lack of any apology by the state police in the UK (and others states) for being behind the recent false terror incidents. We have had 3 false arrests of Muslims so far based on bigotted people being taken as robust witnesses by the police:

    When the police arrested the infamous pope assassins they were very keen to keep the press informed about their “vigilance”. The “assassins” have now been released.

    Then there was the British Somali who was not arrested by British police at Liverpool Airport; instead they passed their “intelligence” and the buck to the Dutch police. He has now been now released.

    A canadian plane was diverted from the UK to Sweden (which in itself is strange) based on a phone call from a woman in Canada. A pakistani was arrested but has now been released.

    Now that they have all been released, all we see is small corrections in the papers and hardly any apology from them or from the UK state media such as the BBC or from zionist media such as SKY or from bigoted rags like the Telegraph.

    What do bigots make of all this?