Main

April 17, 2008

Government puts trust in moderate foreign imams

Smith invites moderate imams into UK to help Muslim communities fight extremism (from the Guardian)

Jacqui Smith, the new Home Secretary, proposes to invite moderate foreign imams (from the Indian Subcontinent) in an apparent attempt to fight extremism in the UK. The report mostly focusses on new anti-terrorist police jobs and kicking foreign terrorism suspects out, so there is not much room for discussing where these moderate figures are to come from, as in which institutions in the home countries.

I always thought that common thinking on the subject was that foreign imams were the problem, not the solution? Many of these imams do not speak English, at least not enough to deliver a meaningful sermon, much less personal guidance, and the proportion of Muslims in this country of Subcontinental descent who speak good Urdu has declined over the years (to say nothing of those who never spoke Urdu to begin with). The presence of imams whose English is not sufficient, or who choose not to use it "for the sake of the old folk", shuts out people who do not speak the language they use, which includes converts as well as immigrants from other Muslim countries. Meanwhile, the extremists and sectarians are only too willing and able to use English.

Surely the solution is to employ more British-born scholars as imams, whether they be trained in the Middle East or in the Subcontinent, while maintaining agreements with the governments in those countries to allow them to stay rather than kicking them out after every "security" (or security PR) panic. Perhaps also, religious institutions in the UK should be supported (they do not need to be founded anew, as was the Maynooth Catholic seminary in Ireland, founded by the British to dissuade Irish Catholics from going to Europe to study). This way, we end up with a form of religion which is relevant to the average Muslim in this country, rather than only to the Asians, or just some of them.

October 13, 2007

A senseless Eid scandal

To start off, now that it really is Eid and I've got the time and energy to type, Eid Mubarak everybody.

Anyway ...

All this Ramadan, I've been working on the assumption that today was going to be Eid, largely on the basis that moonsighting.com published their usual diagram of where the moon could be sighted last night. It was crystal clear - the moon could only be sighted clearly in one tiny corner of the south Pacific, and might be visible with instruments in the far south of South America, in the sparsely populated south of Chile and Argentina (where there are probably very few Muslims). It would have been fine by me if Eid was actually yesterday, because I could have done my driving job (delivering timber and heavy bags of powdered plaster and cement) on six hours of sleep rather than five, but then, fasting itself isn't meant to be easy or convenient, is it? (More: Ginny [1], [2], Muslim Apple, Svend White.)

Continue reading "A senseless Eid scandal" »

October 8, 2007

Counter-reformation II

Some Criticism on my Islamic reform series « Ali Eteraz

Ali Eteraz posted a reply to an article I posted last weekend, in reply to his three articles on Islamic reform and the alleged "counter-reformation" which has gained pace since 9/11. Here is my reply to parts of his reply:

Continue reading "Counter-reformation II" »

October 6, 2007

Response to Ali Eteraz on "Islamic reform"

Ali Eteraz has recently posted a series of articles on Comment is Free on what he calls "Islamic reform" ([1], [2], [3]). He defines Islamic reform as what happens when "a Muslim dissents from this traditional orthodoxy, and provides an alternative which he or she believes more accurately captures the spirit of Islam", the traditional orthodoxy in question being Ash'ari doctrine, the separation of the religious scholars from the political leadership, classical methodologies in drawing the Shari'ah from the revealed texts (usul al-fiqh) and Sufism.

Continue reading "Response to Ali Eteraz on "Islamic reform"" »

May 14, 2007

Mars now using animal rennet

The Guardian: A Mars Bar a day? No longer an option if you are vegetarian

It's not a rumour this time - I'm well aware how annoying these food rumours are which do the rounds on mailing lists and forums from time to time, but ...

It has been announced that the company behind the Mars bar are to start using animal rennet in their confectionery, including Mars itself, Twix, Milky Way, Snickers and Bounty. Some scholars, particularly Hanafis, say this means the bars are still halaal. Others, particularly those outside the Hanafi school, say that rennet must come from an Islamically slaughtered animal to be halaal.

However, since they no longer qualify as suitable for vegetarians, it also leaves open the possibility that the company may move on to using other animal-derived ingredients, such as meat-derived fats. The reader might make up his or her own mind.

April 30, 2007

Sufi singing at Fez airport

Sama at Fez airport - Google Video

This is a Google video of some brothers coming back from a visit to Shaikh Hamza Boutchich in Morocco who got stuck at Fez airport after Ryanair, they say, "abandoned" them. Reminds me of why I used to go to their meetings even though it's not my tariqa.

March 10, 2007

Fight the people?

A Maltreated Hadith translated from Muhammad Al-Ghazali's (may Allah have mercy on him) Al-'Ilal wal-Adaweyyah by Umm Majeed* - The Translators

The Translators (in this case, Umm Majeed) give a correct understanding of the Hadeeth, "I was commanded to fight the people until they proclaim that there is no deity worthy of worship except God alone, if they accept this faith then their lives and wealth will be secure except with due process of law", commonly cited by both Muslim extremists and Islam-haters as proof that Islam enjoins us to "fight the people" here and now. In fact, it referred to the Arab polytheists "were resentfully unwilling to let Islam exist and violated every peace treaty and covenant they agreed to". There are different verses, as the sister explains, covering the People of the Book.

February 26, 2007

Shaikh Nuh Keller: takfir and the Subcontinental divide

Jinnzaman recently blogged a lengthy article by Shaikh Nuh Ha Mim Keller on the subject of the rulings of takfeer, who is entitled to pronounce it, when and why, and how it relates to the infamous Bareilawi-Deobandi fitna:

Iman, Kufr, And Takfir (updated to point to new Shadhili Tariqa site).

Also, Jinnzaman linked a Deobandi response by br. Hanif at Basaa'ir and a thread about it on a pro-Bareilawi forum. The common theme is that perhaps Shaikh Nuh is not the most qualified to talk about the issue as he doesn't speak Urdu but relies on his mureeds to translate things, and that if he did he'd come down on their side. However, Hanif's response is more reasonably-argued; the Bareilawi responses are the usual partisan raving you find whenever such matters find their ways onto online fora, which is why their discussion is banned on some (e.g. Deenport).

February 4, 2007

Reflections on Salafism's rise and fall

Umar Lee recently posted a ten-part history on the rise and fall of the "salafi da'wah" in the USA (last post, with comments and links to the other nine, here). The whole series made me thoroughly glad that I was guided away from it (alhamdu lillah); although I was aware that "salafis" were fighting amongst themselves and that attacks were being posted on various "salafi" websites, such as the infamous Salafi Publications and TROID (who are blamed, to a large extent, for causing the acrimonious schism which took place around the turn of this century), I did not realise how bitter it was and how much social dislocation it caused.

The last post in the series is certainly among the most commented-on articles in the history of the Muslim blogosphere; other comments from Tariq Nelson, Ginny Quick, Kashif, Jinnzaman and Austrolabe, with an interesting perspective from Jinnzaman: that the persuasive effects of traditional Islamic websites and web forum contributions were important in reducing "salafi" influence.

I have a few comments of my own to make, which are too long to make at Umar's own blog.

Continue reading "Reflections on Salafism's rise and fall" »

October 1, 2006

Advertisers targeting Ramadan

BBC News Video: Advertisers targeting Ramadan

A BBC news report on how Ramadan keeps Muslim families at home together - which often, in practice, means in front of the TV, which advertisers see as a useful source of advertising revenue. Advertisers, particularly on Islamic channels and in Muslim countries, often use emotional and moral themes in their advertisements, such as one shown by the Petronas company. (BBC Video uses Windows Media and Real Media; sadly there's no text version.)

September 18, 2006

Pope criticises, Anjem embarrasses

It's depressing to see Muslims once again resorting to violence in response, no doubt, to rumours about what the Pope may or may not have said in his speech at Regensburg last week (extracts at the BBC's website, with a full translation in PDF, here). The news today reports that a Catholic nun has been murdered in Mogadishu, that a so-called cleric in the same city has called on Muslims to hunt the pope down and kill him, and that churches in Palestine have been vandalised (I thought Muslims and Christians in Palestine were supposed to be on the same side). Most depressingly of all, though perhaps not surprisingly, the usual small group of extremists turned up outside Westminster cathedral - I can't find it on any news website (though there are some pictures on this blog), but the BBC TV News interviewed one of the demonstrators, Anjem Choudhary, identifying him as being from a "Muslim radical group". Given that all his radical groups are banned, I'd like to ask: which one does he represent now? (More: Izzy Mo, Abu Eesa, Osama Saeed [1], [2], [3], Lenin's Tomb, Juan Cole [1], [2], DA / Crime of Aquinas, Ginny, Umar Lee.)

Continue reading "Pope criticises, Anjem embarrasses" »

July 9, 2006

Upcoming RMW event and anti-RMW programme

Radical Middle Way Event: Shaikh Walead Mohammed, an American graduate of al-Azhar (who has also studied in Damascus) is to give a talk this Tuesday in London and next Sunday in Oxford on the topic "What good is the Shariah in the West?". The talk is to focus on the maqaasid (goals and objectives) of the Shari'ah, and how they can be applicable to us in the west; it is also, insha Allah, to discuss whether we need Shari'ah courts and how the Shari'ah will meet the challenges of the 21st century, such as climate change, minority issues, medical ethics and finance.

The first talk is this Tuesday (11th July) at the Froud Centre (Romford Road, Manor Park, London E12 5JF) from 7pm to 9pm; the second is next Sunday (16th July) at Oxford Central Mosque (Manzil Way, Oxford OX4 1DJ) from 3pm to 5pm. Contacts are 07092 032 136 or email info@islamiccircles.com for London and 07709 178117 for Oxford. Admission to both is free and all are welcome.

Also, next Friday a documentary about the RMW and other aspects of the British reaction to the London bombings will air this coming Friday (14th July) at 7:30pm on Channel 4. Who Speaks for Muslims is by Martin Bright, who has written a series of articles for the New Statesman on the subject, basically alleging (as you can read here from the current edition) that the roadshow was planned in advance and did not come out of a post-bombing consultation which reported on 22nd September 2005, an accusation the Foreign Office denies. Nick Cohen promotes the documentary in today's Observer and Bright has also produced a pamphlet for the Policy Exchange on the same topic, which is to be published this Wednesday. (More: Osama Saeed.)

May 28, 2006

Ben Marshall on Runnymede and Islamophobia

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

In this month's New Humanist there's a one-page article by Ben Marshall (a freelance journalist) on Islamophobia, in which the author "embraces his phobia", defending it as "an entirely reasonable and honourable intellectual position". The magazine is a bi-monthly, founded in 1885 as the Literary Review, and claims that it "has distinguished itself as a world leader in supporting and promoting humanism and rational inquiry and opposing religious dogma, irrationalism and bunkum wherever it is found". A typical issue will feature ridicule of some aspect of religion - the present issue has a short piece about Malaysians discussing where to face in prayer when in space, for example. Marshall starts off by attacking those who try to defend Muslims from Islamophobia, including the Runnymede Trust (a race relations body which published a report on Islamophobia in 1997) and the blog Islamophobia Watch. He also makes it clear that he is generally anti-religious and, like a lot of secular humanists, lumps religion in with superstition.

Continue reading "Ben Marshall on Runnymede and Islamophobia" »

May 27, 2006

Murtadd Nazir-Ali on defending all faiths

The BBC reports that the bishop of Rochester, Michael Nazir-Ali, has some opinions on the Prince of Wales' plan to be "Defender of Faith" when (or if) he takes the throne:

The Prince of Wales cannot defend all faiths because the differences between them makes such a position untenable, a senior Anglican bishop has said.

The Bishop of Rochester, Dr Michael Nazir-Ali, said all faiths could not be defended because of serious differences between various religions.

He said Prince Charles would be obliged to take an oath to defend the Christian church if he succeeded to the throne.

Dr Nazir-Ali has also warned against "multi-faith mish-mash" in the UK.

He told BBC Radio 4's Today programme the monarchy and the legal system had both emerged from the Judeo-Christian ethic.

Not that Nazir-Ali is biased or anything.

February 12, 2006

Bin Bayyah fatwa a fake

Much discussion ensued on Deenport when someone posted a synopsis of a supposed fatwa from Abdullah bin Bayyah to the effect that the fake jumu'ah prayers held with Amina Wadud as the "imam" were valid. The fatwa was supposedly issued "for reasons of compassion for those who have only recently entered Islam". It has now been confirmed through Shaikh Hamza Yusuf that the fatwa was never given at all, and that there are those who put such material out in order to ruin their reputations, but it could have been issued by someone who simply had not understood what the shaikh had actually said. The supposed fatwa came to us by way of an Arabic news website, which is not the most reliable way of obtaining guidance from the scholars.

Continue reading "Bin Bayyah fatwa a fake" »