Main

April 2, 2008

How sincere is Hassan Butt?

The last couple of weeks there has been a controversy over a new book being co-written by Hassan Butt, former al-Muhajiroun activist and self-proclaimed terrorist fixer and fundraiser, and the British writer and "journalist" Shiv Malik. The two were hoping to tell the world about Butt's exploits in Pakistan after the 9/11 atrocities; the police had other ideas, and demanded that Malik hand over the unfinished manuscript. Nick Cohen hailed the two as "persecuted peacemakers" in this article for the Observer the Sunday before last. Some of us, however, are not so convinced by Butt's turn-around.

Continue reading "How sincere is Hassan Butt?" »

March 25, 2008

Omar Bakri expresses dim view of Amir Khan

Today's Sun (Murdoch-owned London tabloid) led with a front-page story about something Omar Bakri said about Amir Khan. Omar Bakri is the former leader of the disbanded al-Muhajiroun, who ran noisy demonstrations and street-corner stalls until they were banned in 2005; Amir Khan is a British Pakistani boxer. Apparently, "in an internet exchange with other extremists", Omar Bakri said that Khan was jahil, meaning ignorant:

Asked if Amir was setting a bad example by draping himself in the flag, he replied: "I don't think somebody should really look to Amir Khan as a good example for the youth.

"So now for him to be wrapping himself in British flag is another sign of somebody who is completely jahil. You give him the excuse of ignorance for living among the kuffar. So you can't call him kuffar but you can call him jahil and deviant person."

Continue reading "Omar Bakri expresses dim view of Amir Khan" »

January 6, 2008

Why Rochester is not a no-go area for Michael Nazir-Ali

Michael Nazir-Ali, bishop of Rochester (previously: [1], [2], [3]), has been given another bit of space in the Sunday Telegraph to write an Islamophobic article (also see front-page feature here). This time, he's alleging that Muslims have set out "'no-go' areas where adherence to this ideology has become a mark of acceptability". This is not the first time a publication of the Telegraph group has made this accusation: it is part of Patrick Sookhdeo's stock-in-trade of accusations. Nazir-Ali today claimed that this resurgence of "the ideology of Islamic extremism" accompanied the loss of "confidence in the Christian vision which underlay most of the achievements and values of the culture" and a "novel philosophy of 'multiculturalism'". (More: Osama Saeed, Abu Eesa, Kashif @ Peace, Bruv, Suspect Paki.)

Continue reading "Why Rochester is not a no-go area for Michael Nazir-Ali" »

September 6, 2007

"Radical" books in east London libraries

BBC NEWS | UK | Radical books in London libraries

A report by the so-called Centre for Social Cohesion, a project of the right-wing think tank Civitas, has found that libraries in Tower Hamlets, the London borough with the densest Muslim population, have Islamic book collections they say are dominated by "radicals" and Wahhabis. The report, entitled Hate on the State and written by James Brandon and Douglas Murray ([1], [2]), can be downloaded in PDF form here.

Continue reading ""Radical" books in east London libraries" »

July 8, 2007

"Old really is gold"

Terrorism, Stability and Other Personal Thoughts « AE

Abu Eesa has an interesting take on the recent phenomenon of turncoat "reformed extremists" who present themselves as some sort of true face of Islam, with particular reference to the troubles among the Muslims which followed Abu Qatada's issuing of a fatwa legitimising the killing of innocent civilians:

So, the real common factor was a lack of stability. They were unstable then, and they are unstable now – like leaves floating around in the wind, changing religious direction with every puff as if Islam was some kind of a game. Just as such people were not to be trusted in their deviation then, we have little reason to trust them now.

Actually, it is a lucky few that start their Islamic development on a moderate path and maintain that throughout the years, without going to extremes, without ending up contradicting their entire methodology within the space of just a few years such as one has seen with the much tainted “Sufi to Salafi” and “Salafi to Sufi” switches, or more vividly the “Radical to Pacifist” switch of recent times. Your community representatives, teachers, elders and leaders should be chosen for their continual balance and stability over the last twenty years and not the last twenty months, for it is ‘ilm and hilm attained over a long period of time that are the pillars of such calmness and wisdom that helps a community in difficult times such as now.