Main

May 4, 2008

Secular Asians for Secular Democracy

Islamophobia Watch - Home - Stop pandering to Muslims says 'silent majority'

Last week an outfit calling itself "British Muslims for Secular Democracy" had their big launch party, attended by Baroness Kishwer Falkner and "former Islamist Ed Husain". This is after the group, and its rather shoddy website (text which gets bigger when you move the mouse over it, blue bars in the middle of the text), have been active for months, if not well over a year. Its chair is Yasmin Alibhai-Brown and its trustees include the infamous Taj Hargey, senior NHS manager Dr Shaaz Mahboob, a bloke called Imran Ahmad who wrote a book called Unimagined and has some sort of career in Information Systems in which he travels round the world, and Ghayasuddin Siddiqui (and that's only the people whose profile says other than that they are BMSD trustees). This list, while it may be said to be diverse, is hardly representative of the large body of Muslims that the existing Muslim organisations already represent.

Continue reading "Secular Asians for Secular Democracy" »

January 25, 2008

Review of London lecture on French hijab politics

This evening the American feminist academic Joan Wallach Scott, a professor of social science at Princeton, NJ, gave a lecture to promote her book, The Politics of the Veil (Princeton, 2007) (reviewed in the New Statesman here). The lecture was held at the London School of Economics (LSE), presently part of the University of London, and was well-attended, with both men and women, including quite a few Muslims (although fewer than I expected), in the packed 240-seat lecture theatre. The lecture, and the book, offers an intriguing insight into the "debate" which led to the imposition of the ban.

Continue reading "Review of London lecture on French hijab politics" »

May 29, 2007

Our alleged duty to respect Israel

Melanie Phillips’s Diary; The Islamic duty to respect Israel

Melanie Phillips, courtesy of "Arabs for Israel", has found a selection of Qur'anic verses which supposedly enjoin Muslims to respect Israel - not the prophet (peace be upon him) of that name, but the modern-day state. You can read them all at the link above.

Do people never think of the history before they quote verses (or bits of verses) out of context? The verses quoted are intended to demonstrate that Islam supports the notion of Israel (and, incidentally, all of what they called Judea and Samaria, i.e. the West Bank) being the Jews' promised land, when in fact we believe that this promise has been delivered on and is no longer valid. (You might notice the use of the past tense.) Several of them are clearly phrased as invitations to the Jews to embrace Islam (as might have become obvious if the surrounding verses were also quoted), which would have been recited by the prophet Muhammad (sall' Allahu 'alaihi wa sallam) to the Jews of his time in Madinah.

Continue reading "Our alleged duty to respect Israel" »

March 7, 2007

Gay Humanists offer Spencerian bigotry

Islamophobia Watch drew my attention to an article by Barbara Smoker, former president of the National Secular Society, in the latest edition of the Gay Humanist Quarterly. The edition is freely downloadable but is an image-based PDF, which means not only that I can't copy and paste it but also that if you are using a screen reader it might not pick it up. Clearly, the visually-impaired are one group whose inclusion they don't much care for, or perhaps they just don't know how to produce a decent PDF which isn't very difficult. Anyway, Barbara Smoker offers up the usual facetiousness which is typical of secularist attitudes to religious sensitivities, with a bit of ignorant bigotry any Jihad Watch or LGF goon could have come up with.

Continue reading "Gay Humanists offer Spencerian bigotry" »

January 7, 2007

Secular fundamentalists "the new totalitarians"

Tobias Jones (of The Dark Heart of Italy fame) on militant atheists who behave like totalitarians, hiding among anti-sexists, anti-homophobes and anti-racists, but in reality seeking to erase religion totally from the Earth, starting with the public sphere. He saw them first trying to exploit British politeness by removing religious symbols on the spurious grounds that they offend people of other faiths, and when this did not work, they switched to deliberately giving offence instead:

In recent years the nastier side of this totalitarianism has become blatantly apparent. It emerged with the hijab issue in France. With the hijab ban in French schools, a state was banishing religion not only from its corridors, but also from its citizens.

It was an assertion that after centuries of the naked public square (denuded of religion referents) the public now too had to go naked. The former had been true tolerance, something exceptional and laudable. It allowed everyone to bring their own cosmic testimony to the square. But this new form of "tolerance" changed things. From everyone being welcome, it had become everyone but.

There's a background to all this. Since 2001, lazy intellectuals have been allowed to get away with repeating the nonsense that terrorism and war are the consequences of belief in God. Believers are ridiculed for being, in contrast to the stupendously brainy atheists, very dim. Listen to Richard Dawkins' comment on Nadia Eweida (the BA employee who refused to take off her cross): "she had one of the most stupid faces I've ever seen." Nice.

Some aspects of this will be contentious to non-Christians - for example, he asserts that it was Jesus ('alaihi as-salaam) who "invented secularism", presumably with the famous "render unto Caesar ..." teaching, but we all know that for most of the history of the Christian West, the various empires and kingdoms of this part of the world were not at all tolerant, using Crusades and inquisitions to spread Catholicism and eradicate not only local heresies but also Judaism and Islam. However, it's my observation that these atheists really do think they've "got it", as much as any religious fundamentalist, and have utter contempt for anyone who questions their world view. I encountered this attitude on a particular tech forums when a major software project decided to change its logo in order to avoid offending the religious.