{"id":1115,"date":"2005-05-28T23:05:43","date_gmt":"2005-05-28T22:05:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.blogistan.co.uk\/ijwp\/mt.php\/2005\/05\/28\/lots_more_reasons_not_to_bring_in_id_cards"},"modified":"2025-10-11T21:04:33","modified_gmt":"2025-10-11T20:04:33","slug":"lots_more_reasons_not_to_bring_in_id_cards","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.blogistan.co.uk\/blog\/mt.php\/2005\/05\/28\/lots_more_reasons_not_to_bring_in_id_cards","title":{"rendered":"Lots more reasons not to bring in ID cards"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I haven&#8217;t blogged since the 25th &#8211; that&#8217;s probably the longest I&#8217;ve been for a while without a single entry.  The reason is, quite simply, long working hours.  I just have not had the time, due to going out early in the morning and coming back in the late evening after driving frozen Indian food in a not very manoeverable (if I&#8217;ve spelt it right) Japanese truck.<\/p>\n<p><!--more-->Anyway, now that the ID card bill is coming up for discussion, a lot of commentators have come out in fierce opposition.  Personally, I find the scheme a nightmare &#8211; it&#8217;s highly likely to be used to harrass ethnic minorities and Muslim women.  Matthew Parris in the Times yesterday (Saturday) <a href=\"http:\/\/www.timesonline.co.uk\/article\/0,,1065-1630842,00.html\">gives voice<\/a> to a lot of people&#8217;s suspicions about the whole scheme:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Fear of control, suspicion towards the State, and a jealous guarding of privacy and the right to hide, runs very deep in human nature. It is, however, extremely difficult to express in a manner which sounds rational. People will therefore grasp at other planks for their argument. &#8216;ID cards will cost too much&#8217;, &#8216;the technology will fail&#8217;, &#8216;villains will always be able to cheat&#8217; and &#8216;the time is not ripe&#8217; will become the banners that we who oppose the measure will bear aloft, but is that really what has drawn us to the march?<\/p>\n<p>Answering for myself I must say no, and I doubt I am so very different from my countrymen. I want the project not to work. Part of me hopes the machinery for implementing it proves beyond the Home Office&#8217;s wit. I just don&#8217;t want to give government &#8212; any government &#8212; that much control. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>In the New Statesman this week, Christina Zaba has a wholly different reason to oppose it: the fact that it offers enormous potential for security breaches &#8211; quite apart from the unpleasant fact of leaving an &#8220;audit trail&#8221; the state (and whoever else it chooses) can access, but that the person who left it can&#8217;t &#8211; as a number of computer experts have been saying.  It seems that you can&#8217;t design an identity system which is fool-proof and which makes it impossible to generate fake IDs.  She interviews a professional cracker she identifies only as Jamie, who describes a way of generating a false ID from scratch involving using the birth certificate of someone who died young, and laundering it through a temp agency.  He also alleges that &#8220;the off-the-shelf systems they&#8217;re using are easy to break&#8221;, and that people are likely to try and break the system for its own sake.<\/p>\n<p>Bear in mind, Government computer systems have a history of not working very well (the Child Support Agency is a notorious example). Quite apart from the civil liberties objections, the project is likely to be yet another costly disaster.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I haven&#8217;t blogged since the 25th &#8211; that&#8217;s probably the longest I&#8217;ve been for a while without a single entry. The reason is, quite simply, long working hours. I just have not had the&#46;&#46;&#46;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[29],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1115","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p17bgV-hZ","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.blogistan.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1115","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.blogistan.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.blogistan.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.blogistan.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.blogistan.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1115"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.blogistan.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1115\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":42826,"href":"https:\/\/www.blogistan.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1115\/revisions\/42826"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.blogistan.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1115"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.blogistan.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1115"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.blogistan.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1115"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}