We must do away with the “ignore and it’ll go away” myth

Catcalls, whistles, groping: the everyday picture of sexual harassment in London (from the Independent)

Yesterday (Friday) it was reported in the Independent newspaper in London, and discussed on the Vanessa Feltz show on BBC London (and to a lesser extent, on the same station’s breakfast show), that a survey had shown that four in ten young women (under 34) had experienced sexual harassment of some sort on the streets of London. Vicki Simister of the Anti Street Harassment Campaign did an interview with the station, in which she described an incident which escalated from a group of men shouting at her from a car to them pinning her to a wall inside a Tube station, and when bystanders intervened and the police arrived, they blamed her and told her that the assault was her fault for reacting to their initial verbal harassment from the car. There are two other opinion pieces from the paper here and here, and you can listen to the Vanessa Feltz show here until next Friday morning and to the breakfast show here (same time limit).

Continue reading

FacebookTwitterIdenti.caDeliciousDiggStumbleUponWordPressShare
Posted in Crime, Disability, Gender | 4 Comments

Windows 8: tablet as desktop coming to a desk near you

I’ve been noticing various articles about the impending Windows 8 release on OSNews appear recently, and it doesn’t look good. I’ve been using Linux a lot since about 2002, and one of the worst developments on the Linux desktop are environments intended to “unify” the desktop, laptop and tablet user experience when the three (tablets especially) are radically different. Ubuntu’s Unity, for example, was originally released for netbooks only in 2010 and was introduced for other computers in early 2011, to widespread condemnation; it is only in the present release that it has reached any semblance of stability. Windows 7 looks to be the last release of Windows in which the traditional Windows interface with the familiar desktop applications is the standard; Windows 8 will be dominated by Metro, which originates in the world of smartphones and its apps can only be run full-screen or tiled. Old apps will be run inside the so-called Explorer shell, which will function as an application in itself:

Contrary to popular belief, Metro is not a replacement for the Start Menu. Metro is a replacement for the Explorer Shell. The Explorer Shell itself has been turned into an application. Traditional applications run within this Explorer Shell, and cannot be managed from Metro. In other words, the Explorer Shell has become an application with a multiple document interface, running in Metro.

This, right here, is the main reason why Windows 8 is such a pain to use with a mouse and keyboard. You can’t directly switch to a desktop application; you always have to first switch to the Explorer Shell, and then switch to the desktop application you want running within the Explorer Shell. This is a convoluted way of using my computer, especially since Metro itself isn’t mouse-friendly to begin with, with finicky hot corners and UI elements that are too volatile.

Consider this. To switch to a Chrome browser tab, you have to: switch to the Explorer Shell in the Metro application switcher (and hope this doesn’t go wrong), switch to Chrome in the traditional taskbar, and then switch to the right tab within Chrome. This is insanity. Whenever I go through this in Windows 8, I hear this playing in my head.

It’s not a technical issue. Microsoft could easily integrate the two much more efficiently and more fluently if they wanted to. No, the real issue is that Microsoft doesn’t want to, because (and here’s the pill that’s so tough for some to swallow) the Explorer Shell is being deprecated. It’s dead. It needs to be cumbersome and unpleasant because Microsoft hopes this will make users demand Metro versions of their favourite applications.

Continue reading

FacebookTwitterIdenti.caDeliciousDiggStumbleUponWordPressShare
Posted in Android, Linux, Mac, Windows | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Jim Fitzpatrick on halaal meat

Image of the New Statesman's front page from 14th May 2012, with headline "Halal: Britain's most feared meat" with a cut of meat hanging from a hookThere is a letter in this week’s edition of the New Statesman from Jim Fitzpatrick, Labour MP for Poplar and Limehouse, an east London constituency which includes a very large Muslim population (it is the neighbouring seat from Bethnal Green and Bow, which George Galloway was elected to in 2005). The letter was in response to an article on halaal meat in the previous edition by Mehdi Hasan, who presented the arguments for and against halaal slaughter and, in particular, halaal slaughter without stunning. He accepted the point made in Hasan’s article that 90% of halaal meat sold in the UK is from pre-stunned animals, but believes that meat should be clearly labelled if it is HMC-approved (i.e. no stunning) because most people are “concerned about halal because they think it is cruel, not just Muslim and different”.

Continue reading

FacebookTwitterIdenti.caDeliciousDiggStumbleUponWordPressShare
Posted in Islam, Media | Tagged , | 4 Comments

Carole Malone: a new low in victim-blaming


This was on “This Morning”, a chat show that goes out on weekday mornings on ITV1, earlier today (Wednesday): Carol Malone, a tabloid newspaper columnist, gave her judgement on the family of which six children were murdered last Friday in a fire started by pouring petrol through their letterbox. The family had been featured on TV in 2007 when the father, Mick Philpott, had appealed to the local council for a bigger house to accommodate his wife, girlfriend and 14 children. It appeared the girlfriend moved out recently and may have been arrested as a suspect, but reports over the weekend said that a man and a woman had been released without charge.

Continue reading

FacebookTwitterIdenti.caDeliciousDiggStumbleUponWordPressShare
Posted in Crime, Media, TV, Welfare reform, Windbags | 4 Comments

A law unto themselves

What do medical staff and airline staff have in common?

What separates them is that airline staff do not train for their jobs for five years, yet have the safety of dozens, if not hundreds, of passengers in their hands. Doctors train for five years in medical school, then go through several years in junior positions which are essentially learning-on-the-job roles. And whatever they do wrong, 300 people will not get blown out of the sky.

What joins them is that they act like a law unto themselves, and feel entitled to disregard written agreements and assurances. Musicians are told they can take their instruments into the cabin, while disabled travellers are told they can travel … and they turn up and find that their instruments have to be thrown into the hold, or they need a chaperone (which they didn’t last time) or just can’t travel, and the written assurance means nothing. If someone requires a particular, unusual drug, and their clinicians know that, and it’s written on their notes in big letters and they even have a bracelet on and a firm promise that they won’t be given the drug that caused them a stroke in the past but the unusual drug nobody else has … and the patient is under anaesthetic and can’t object, they give them the drug they’re allergic to anyway.

Patients often don’t like taking these drugs. It’s not only doctors who think they’re “dirty”. They have no reason to get sniffy. Patients take them because they have no other choice.

I don’t like keeping a heroin-copycat in the house. I live in fear that my amazing children will somehow find a syringe lying about or a broken glass ampoule top. My GP and I have an understanding. I only ask for a script when things are desperate … — Sue Marsh, April 2012

I hate taking morphine (its actually pure - legal! - heroin) & I know my body is now dependent on it cos I get bad withdrawals if the pump stops going thru 4 some reason. BUT, I couldnt stay the way I was - curled up, crying, in agony, 24/7 - & Id tried literally evry other painkiller going — Lynn Gilderdale, March 2006

Continue reading

FacebookTwitterIdenti.caDeliciousDiggStumbleUponWordPressShare
Posted in Health | 2 Comments

ME Awareness Day 2012: some links

Because of the pressure of work, I’ve been unable to write anything for ME Awareness Day (or even week) this year. I’ve written a few articles over the past year, the two most important events of which have been the release of Voices from the Shadows and the sad death of Emily Collingridge.

Danni Brennand (who has severe ME as well as autism) has posted some links of her own, as well as four articles about how ME affects her, at Dannilion.com.

Continue reading

FacebookTwitterIdenti.caDeliciousDiggStumbleUponWordPressShare
Posted in M.E. | Leave a comment

Review: Acer Aspire 5733Z

Last Saturday I bought a new laptop, a purchase made necessary by the fact that my old laptop had given up the ghost after just over four years. I had been using that for a mixture of web browsing, blogging and software development, with the occasional bit of Word document writing. I had replaced the hard drive after a drop on the floor corrupted part of the old one (which was after bigger drives had become cheaper and before the Thai floods made them much more expensive) and, only a few months ago, upgraded Windows from Vista to 7, which has proved to be an enormous waste of money given how short a time the computer lasted afterwards. I like having a laptop because it means I can sit downstairs with my family and use the computer at the same time, rather than sitting on my own in my room for that purpose, but I also wanted a new laptop because I plan to sell my Dell mini-tower, which is the only other computer I have which runs Windows, and I need Windows not only to run software which isn’t available for the Mac or Linux, but also to produce packages of QTM for distribution. The laptop I bought was the Acer Aspire 5733Z, which I bought from PC World (the same company as Curry’s).

Continue reading

FacebookTwitterIdenti.caDeliciousDiggStumbleUponWordPressShare
Posted in Reviews, Tech | 2 Comments

Why I believe Ken Livingstone lost

DAVOS/SWITZERLAND, 26JAN08 - Ken Livingstone, ...Last night, we discovered that Boris Johnson, the Tory mayor of London elected in 2008, had been re-elected: he gained 44% of first-preference votes against Livingstone’s 40.3%; when second-preference votes were counted, his vote rose to 51.5%. Livingstone has since announced that he will retire rather than fight another election in 2016. According to this BBC report he blamed a slanted media and an unpleasant campaign and called Johnson a “do-nothing mayor” whose achievements over the past four years consisted of opening things he had started, and that it would be the mayor two terms on from the current one who would have a really difficult job. None of the other mayoral candidates retained their deposits (5% of the vote is necessary), and Brian Paddick, the Lib Dem candidate, dropped to fourth place behind Green Party candidate Jenny Jones. The result bucks a nationwide trend of Labour gaining council seats from the Tories; even two Tory London Assembly members, including the well-respected deputy mayor Richard Barnes and the infamous Barnet/Camden representative Brian Coleman. The turnout was a shockingly low 38.1%, down 6% from 2008.

Continue reading

FacebookTwitterIdenti.caDeliciousDiggStumbleUponWordPressShare
Posted in London life, Politics | Tagged , | 3 Comments

It’s not news, and it’s not fit to print

This was originally going to be a BADD post and I was writing it in my head on Tuesday intending to type and post it that evening after work, but work dragged on longer than expected, Lisa Egan posted my article on Katie Hopkins at Where’s the Benefit? and I had another idea for a post for that, and it’s not really focussed enough on disability to justify a BADD inclusion anyway. It just so happens that it was triggered by an attack by a rent-a-gob guest on a radio show who was talking about disability benefits (among other kinds of state benefits), but this issue affects other marginalised communities besides those with disabilities.

Readers in the UK will have heard of the Leveson inquiry, but for those outside, it’s a public inquiry being held into the standards of the British media, which was triggered by revelations about the Murdoch press (principally) illegally accessing people’s voice mails, including those of crime victims and other non-celebrities. This caused such outrage when it was revealed that investigators working for the News of the World, a Murdoch-owned tabloid, had accessed the voice mail belonging to Milly Dowler, a teenager murdered in Surrey in 2002, that News Corporation closed the paper almost immediately, but the fall-out has led to the resignations and arrests of several senior journalists and some senior London police officers. This past week, a Parliamentary committee reported that in their view, Rupert Murdoch was not fit to lead a major media corporation.

Continue reading

FacebookTwitterIdenti.caDeliciousDiggStumbleUponWordPressShare
Posted in Media | Leave a comment

BADD 2012: mobile accessibility

Logo for Blogging Against Disablism DayBeing Accessible Doesn’t Just Mean Ramps – Blogging Against Disablism Day » Dannilion.com

Danni Brennand posted the above article this morning, regarding how accessibility is often taken to mean providing wheelchair ramps, rather than making sure services are accessible to people who cannot reach them at all and cannot use the phone, as she often cannot. A couple of weeks ago, it was reported that a large proportion of commercial websites in the UK are inaccessible to those with visual impairments; they relied on being able to use a mouse, which of course, a blind person cannot do as they cannot see the pointer. Another form of inaccessibility which I have noticed is that some websites do not display properly on mobile browsers, and some do not do so at all.

Continue reading

FacebookTwitterIdenti.caDeliciousDiggStumbleUponWordPressShare
Posted in Disability, Tech | 1 Comment

Disability benefits and the self-made mouth

Picture of Katie HopkinsThis post has been republished at Where’s the Benefit as a guest post, and you can comment there or here.

Last Saturday night, there was a debate on the Stephen Nolan show, a late-night phone-in on the BBC station Radio 5 Live, in which the former Apprentice contestant Katie Hopkins, who styles herself “the only candidate to say ‘no’ to Sir Alan” [Alan Sugar of Amstrad, who runs the TV series, The Apprentice], defended the government’s cuts to disability and housing benefits and Lisa “Lisybabe” Egan and one of the other callers tried to oppose her. Hopkins is clearly of the opinion that disability benefits are given out to an awful lot of people who aren’t really disabled or don’t deserve them, as shown by this tweet: “If people’s disability benefit was handed out from the top rung of a ladder I reckon most would climb the ladder to get it”. Her stance was that people need to rely on their own resources rather than the state as we live in “austere” times, a line that she trotted out again when Lisa reminded her that people had paid National Insurance and that the whole idea of an insurance scheme is that it pays out when things go wrong. As for housing benefit, she said she did not see why the state should pay for people to live in the south-east, without apparently realising that the majority of housing benefit recipients are actually in work. She also posted this rant about child benefits on her blog, claiming (without the slightest evidence, of course) that “for so many of our poorer families in this country the child does not benefit at all – but rather the overweight mother guzzling McDonalds with her large brown Primark bag bulging at her feet”. You can listen to the show here for the next week. (For non-British readers: a Primark bag does not signify affluence.)

Continue reading

FacebookTwitterIdenti.caDeliciousDiggStumbleUponWordPressShare
Posted in Disability, Media, Windbags | 2 Comments

Postal vote reform and Britain’s disabled voters

Picture of the entrance to a polling station at West Hampstead community hallLast week the issue of postal voting reform in the UK was in the news again, after a judge who had found six Labour councillors in Birmingham guilty of postal voting fraud in 2005, saying that the fraud would “disgrace a banana republic”, claimed that only one of fourteen types of fraud he identified had been “just about tackled”. The issue was discussed on Radio 4’s The World At One programme and one interviewee suggested that the rule by which postal votes are issued on demand was scrapped, because it had not increased voter turnout (those who used them generally did so for convenience and would have voted in person had they not been allowed a postal vote) and that no other democracy had postal voting on demand. The issue of whether people with certain types of disabilities would be excluded if the rules on postal voting were tightened was not discussed. (You can listen to the programme here until Wednesday or Thursday, i.e. a week after it was broadcast.)

Continue reading

FacebookTwitterIdenti.caDeliciousDiggStumbleUponWordPressShare
Posted in Community, Disability, Election 2005, Politics | Leave a comment

Eat halaal! Organic is no substitute

HijabMan » The Labels Halal & Zabihah And Why I Choose Local And Organic Instead

The above article explains the author’s decision to prefer locally-produced, organic meat over halaal meat which has been slaughtered in accordance with Islamic guidelines. He argues that the term “halaal” only applies to the method of slaughter and says nothing about the manner in which the animal was reared, including whether it was treated humanely or indeed fed on animal-based feed including pork. He refers to this article from the website SoundVision, which brings in the issue of “mad cow” disease, a disease which can be transmitted to humans when they eat ‘infected’ meat (I use the quote marks because the disease-causing agent is a protein, not a living organism of any sort). His decision is not Islamically valid, for a number of reasons.

Continue reading

FacebookTwitterIdenti.caDeliciousDiggStumbleUponWordPressShare
Posted in Islam | 16 Comments

How do we deal with the care home abuse problem?

I’m starting writing this just before a Panorama programme featuring video’ed evidence of violence against an elderly lady in a care home is aired on British TV. If you don’t have the stomach to watch it, there is an article written by the victim’s daughter on the Daily Mail’s site here and a BBC write-up, including criticism of the Care Quality Commission that aired today, here. The CQC had earlier been criticised for taking its eye off the ball regarding abuse at the Winterbourne View secure unit; Worrall picked the home for her mother after reading an excellent report from the CQC, which gave an approving report after the abuse had been revealed, claiming that the abuse was an “isolated incident”. (You can watch the programme here in the UK for a year after transmission.)

Continue reading

FacebookTwitterIdenti.caDeliciousDiggStumbleUponWordPressShare
Posted in Crime, Disability | 4 Comments

On vocationalism

I often hear it said that various professions, particularly medicine, nursing and teaching, are meant to be vocations, and that it is surprising that members of these professions are often found to be uncaring and even abusive given that they must have had entered them on the basis of some sort of vocation: they must have wanted to care for people, otherwise they could have chosen any number of other professions. This is often said in response to scandals in hospitals where nurses were found not to be empathetic or caring or where doctors abuse patients or (like Dr Fawaz al-Akhras, the father of Bashar al-Assad’s wife) are found to be collaborating with a brutal dictatorship as it tries to crush dissent. Sadly, this has never been true of a lot of members of these professions.

Continue reading

FacebookTwitterIdenti.caDeliciousDiggStumbleUponWordPressShare
Posted in Disability | 1 Comment

Baby boomers didn’t cause all the world’s problems

Yesterday, on the Jeremy Vine news discussion programme on Radio 2, they were discussing the proposition that the “baby boomers” (the generation born within about 20 years after the end of World War II) are guilty of causing the present economic crisis and are somehow stealing from the young, because they all have lots of money and nice houses which they were able to buy because they had free university education which they now deny to today’s young. That’s a kind of parody of it but it’s that ridiculous. Jeremy Vine suggested to an interviewee that perhaps the older should apologise to the young, and she responded by saying there was nothing to apologise for, with which I agree.

Continue reading

FacebookTwitterIdenti.caDeliciousDiggStumbleUponWordPressShare
Posted in Media, Recession / Credit Crunch | 1 Comment

Brief review: Derek

Derek is Ricky Gervais’s latest TV outing and one which has caused some controversy among journalists and even among disability activists online, with some claiming that Derek is a parody of someone with a learning disability or perhaps an autistic spectrum disorder (or maybe both), and others believing Gervais’s claim that he isn’t disabled but rather “a tender, innocent man whose love for his job and the people he cares for shines through”. It has been suggested that many of the critics have not watched the programme, so I made myself sit through it (it’s only 25 minutes long). The programme is a fake fly-on-the-wall documentary set in an old people’s home, where Derek tries to get the only female member of staff to be his girlfriend, without success. I am not convinced by Gervais’s claim and think this programme both pokes fun at learning disability and makes light of a miserable situation for the old people in the home. It is available here on 4 On Demand for the next month.

Continue reading

FacebookTwitterIdenti.caDeliciousDiggStumbleUponWordPressShare
Posted in Disability, Reviews | Leave a comment

Fear-free healthcare

Picture of Emily Collingridge, a white woman wearing a necklace with several large ornaments on it, sitting in an armchair.Recently the ME community online had to deal with the sad news of three deaths, including one of its best-known and most loved activists, Emily Collingridge (right). There were also two inquests which reported in the last couple of months, those of Lois Owen who died in 2009 and Victoria Webster who died last year. All had very severe ME and, it appears, died of its complications (the immediate cause of Emily’s death will not be known until the inquest is heard later in the year). A major cause of Emily’s final deterioration was a hospital admission in late 2009, following a period in which her condition had improved somewhat; the environment in the hospital was clearly very unsuited to someone who was highly sensitive to light and sound and needed a low-stimulation environment. A further problem with British hospitals has to do with the medical and nursing professions: the fact that there is a substantial number of people with in it who are uncaring, dismissive or abusive and it has led to many people with chronic illnesses becoming fearful or even phobic of hospitals. This simply should not be the case.

Continue reading

FacebookTwitterIdenti.caDeliciousDiggStumbleUponWordPressShare
Posted in Disability, M.E. | 5 Comments

Trayvon Martin and rad-fem bigotry

Name the Problem « You think I just don't understand, but I don't believe you. (also here)

I don’t normally follow American (or any other) radical feminist blogs, but I saw this when a friend I encountered through the ME community flagged it up the other day. The article, by Baltimore lesbian activist Cathy “Bug” Brennan, asserts that the murder of Trayvon Martin by George Zimmerman should be viewed as an example of “male violence” given that males commit 87% of homicides and 91.3% of homicides involving guns in the USA “suggesting that lethality increases because of the weapons Males choose”:

Given these grim statistics, why have we as a society failed to address the problem of male violence? When a lesbian points out these statistics, she is usually greeted with accusations of “man hater.” When a female points out these statistics, she is sometimes greeted with accusations of “lesbian.” If statistics bear out that males are more violent as a class and more lethal as a class of perpetrators (and they do), why isn’t this the subject of substantial inquiry?

We are averse to acknowledging male violence because we do not want to make the males in our lives uncomfortable. In addition, just as it is uncomfortable for males to acknowledge that they benefit from sexism and male privilege, it is equally uncomfortable for males to take responsibility for the disproportionate violence they commit. Try having this conversation with the significant males and Nigels in your lives and see what happens. Try pointing this out to male (or “formerly” male) GLBT Community members and watch the defensiveness fly!

Continue reading

FacebookTwitterIdenti.caDeliciousDiggStumbleUponWordPressShare
Posted in Crime, Gender, Racism, USA | 3 Comments

Will YOU pay for disabled people’s services?

Picture of Katie Carron, an autistic 3-year-old girl murdered by her motherRachel Cohen Rottenberg recently blogged about the recurrent problem of parents of children with severe disabilities (usually autism) murdering them, and the stock response being that the mother (as it usually is, but not always) must have been under so much stress and there’s so little support. She responds that the real reason for both the lack of support and the recurrent murder problem is the devaluation of disabled peoples lives and that there never is any excuse for murder:

All attempts to explain this tragedy hide from view an essential fact about becoming a parent: In having a child, you make a commitment that, even if you end up in the worst extremity, you’ll protect the child’s life. That’s a basic, sacred trust. The child didn’t ask to be born, didn’t ask to be difficult, didn’t ask to be disabled. When people don’t speak to that commitment and that trust, but start talking about how difficult the child was, and how the parents lacked services, I get really scared. Because there will always be people without adequate support. And if people can’t simply say, “I don’t care how bad the parent’s life is. The parent broke a sacred trust with the child and had no right to do so,” I don’t see that there is any protection for disabled people at all. It’s very frightening to me. It means that I live in a society that is nothing short of barbaric.

Continue reading

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

FacebookTwitterIdenti.caDeliciousDiggStumbleUponWordPressShare
Posted in Asperger's / autism, Crime | 2 Comments